Abstract 5479
Background
Over 60% of patients (pts) with stage IV melanoma may develop brain metastases, resulting in a significantly increased morbidity and poor overall prognosis. Clinical data for melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treatments are limited, as controlled studies often exclude pts with untreated brain metastases.
Methods
We conducted a multicenter, retrospective case series investigation with consecutive pts with BRAF-mutant MBM who were treated with BRAF inhibitor encorafenib plus MEK inhibitor binimetinib to evaluate the antitumor response with this combination. Assessments included intracranial, extracranial & global objective response rates (ORRs; percentage of complete [CR] + partial [PR] responses) evaluated by modified RECIST version 1.1; clinical benefit rate (CBR; percentage of CR + PR + stable disease [SD] as best response); time to response, duration of response, and safety.
Results
A total of 17 pts with stage IV BRAF-mutant MBM who received encorafenib plus binimetinib in centers in the United States were included. Pts had received a median of 2 prior lines of treatment over a median of 520 days since their melanoma diagnosis (median of 55 days since diagnosis of MBM). Of the patients included, 82% had prior treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. The intracranial ORR was 35% (with 3 CRs and 3 PRs) and CBR was 76%, with a median duration of response of 17 weeks. Eight pts with either stable disease or a response were still ongoing treatment at the time of this analysis. Among the 14 MBM pts with prior BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, the intracranial ORR was 21% and CBR was 71%. Similar outcomes were observed for extracranial and global responses. The safety profile for encorafenib plus binimetinib was similar to that observed in pts with melanoma without brain metastases.
Conclusions
Combination therapy with encorafenib plus binimetinib elicited intracranial activity in pts with BRAF-mutant MBM, including in pts previously treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Further prospective studies are warranted. *K. Holbrook and J. Lutzky are co-first authors.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Editorial assistance was provided by JD Cox and Mayville Medical Communications, with funding from Array Biopharma.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Array BioPharma Inc.
Funding
Array BioPharma.
Disclosure
J. Lutzky: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Array BioPharma; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Regeneron; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb. A. Amin: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Regeneron. J.M. Davis: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Exelixis Inc; Advisory / Consultancy: Array BioPharma. M.A. Davies: Advisory / Consultancy: Array BioPharma; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche/Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Vaccinex; Advisory / Consultancy: Syndax; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Nanostring. A. Diab: Advisory / Consultancy: Array BioPharma. I.C. Glitza: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Array BioPharma. R.N. Amaria: Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Array BioPharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Iovance. S. Patel: Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Cardinal Health; Advisory / Consultancy: Castle Biosciences; Research grant / Funding (institution): Deciphera; Advisory / Consultancy, DSMB: Immunocore; Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Provectus; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), DSMB: Reata. H.A. Tawbi: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Array BioPharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): GSK. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3973 - A randomized phase II study on the OPTimization of IMmunotherapy in squamous carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) – OPTIM (AIO-KHT-0117)
Presenter: Viktor Grünwald
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3489 - Overall Survival (OS) and Metastasis-Free Survival (MFS) in men with Biochemically Relapsed (BCR) Prostate Cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) managed with deferred Androgen Deprivation Treatment (ADT): A combined Johns Hopkins and CPDR study
Presenter: Catherine Marshall
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4606 - ARCHES – the role of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with enzalutamide (ENZA) or placebo (PBO) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): Post hoc analyses of high and low disease volume and risk groups
Presenter: Arnulf Stenzl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2975 - Updated survival analyses of a multicentric phase II randomized trial of docetaxel (D) plus enzalutamide (E) versus docetaxel (D) as first line chemotherapy for patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) (CHEIRON study).
Presenter: Orazio Caffo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2708 - Real-world analysis of patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving vs not receiving chemotherapy in the treatment sequence
Presenter: Alicia Morgans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2134 - Baseline fracture risk in men with prostate cancer starting the STAMPEDE trial
Presenter: Janet Brown
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3504 - Risk of falls and fractures in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with new hormonal agents – a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Presenter: Rodrigo Coutinho Mariano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2342 - Pain progression at initiation of chemotherapy in metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) is associated with a poor prognosis: a post-hoc analysis of FIRSTANA
Presenter: Nicolas Delanoy
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5331 - Pain evaluation in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 (Ra-223) in the PARABO observation study
Presenter: Holger Palmedo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2823 - Time to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and the risk of developing immune disorders
Presenter: Vincenza Conteduca
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract