Abstract 2975
Background
D and E demonstrated to be efficacious in the treatment of mCRPC pts. Due to different antitumor mechanism of action of these agents, it could be postulated that their combination can improve disease control. CHEIRON study tried to demonstrate the candidate efficacy of chemo-hormonal combination D+E versus D in mCRPC first-line.
Methods
Eligibility criteria included mCRPC diagnosis, ECOG PS ≤ 2, adequate renal, hepatic and hematological functions, no prior treatment for mCRPC. Pts were randomized to receive D 75 mg/m2 IV d1 q3w plus prednisone 5 mg PO BID for 8 courses alone or plus E 160 mg PO daily for 24 weeks. Stratification criteria were presence of pain and visceral metastases. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of pts without disease progression (according to PCWG2) at 6 mos after randomization.
Results
Between 09/2014 and 10/2017, 246 pts (median age 70 years, range 44-88, pain reported by 54 pts, visceral metastases present in 50 pts) were randomized to DE (120) or D (126). The rate of pts without disease progression at 6 mos was significantly higher in DE arm compared to D arm (89.1% vs 72.8%; p = 0.002). Similarly, a higher proportion of DE pts achieved a PSA reduction ≥ 50% compared to the baseline values compared to the D pts (92% vs 69%; p < 0.0001). No differences were observed in terms of objective response rate. Major haematological toxicities consisted of grade 3-4 neutropenia (19 pts DE – 15 pts D); febrile neutropenia was observed in 10 DE pts and in 7 D pts. At a median follow-up of 24 mos, the median progression free survival was 10.1 mos and 9.1 mos in DE and D arm, respectively (p = 0.01). In DE arm the median overall survival was 33.7 mos compared to 29.6 mos of the standard arm (p NS).
Conclusions
The present study was the first phase II randomized trial, which tested the addition of a new generation hormone agent to D compared to D alone. From this data, DE improved the 6-mo disease control with a prolongation of PFS compared to the standard chemotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02453009.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Astellas.
Disclosure
O. Caffo: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca. D. Gasparro: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Janssen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Astellas; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer. R. Iacovelli: Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. U.F.F. De Giorgi: Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi. G. Pappagallo: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Genzyme; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Pierre Fabre; Honoraria (self): Roche. M. Aglietta: Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self): PharmaMar; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Tesaro. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5520 - Patient’s Usability Test results of a CINV Diary Application For Smartphones
Presenter: Paz Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2323 - Colorectal Telephone Assessment Pathway (CTAP) - A viable means of shortening time to a definitive diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Presenter: Harriet Watson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6119 - Cancer Nursing and Social Media: Capturing the Zeitgeist
Presenter: Mark Foulkes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1776 - Examination of mobile applications on breast cancer
Presenter: AYDANUR AYDIN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4128 - E-health effectiveness to increase patient adherence for immunotherapy; a cost-benefit study.
Presenter: Maria José Dias
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3219 - Experiences of internet-based stepped care among individuals with recently diagnosed cancer and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression
Presenter: Anna Hauffman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5010 - What do cancer patients know about their immunotherapy treatment?
Presenter: Mónica Arellano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4503 - Prospective Comparison of Travel Burden, Cost and Time to Obtain Tumor Board Treatment Plan Through In-Person Visits vs. an AI Enabled Health Technology (N=1803)
Presenter: Rajendra Badwe
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4123 - Cancer care through the fire and flames: 3-year experience in the utilisation of electronic consultation and referral system at the Red Zone in Southern Thailand
Presenter: Nanthiya Rattanakhot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2087 - The effect of e-mobile education on the quality of life in women with breast cancer
Presenter: Derya ÇInar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract