Abstract 5330
Background
No biomarkers predict efficacy of 5-FU for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A gene expression based drug response predictor (DRP) had been shown to predict benefit of 5-FU in the PETACC-3 cohort [1]. The current study aimed to validate the biomarker in a cohort of mCRC patients.
Methods
100 mCRC patients treated with 5-FU and leucovorin (FLV) at Sahlgrenska University Hospital from 1996-2013 had mRNA isolated from pretreatment formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue and run on Affymetrix HG-133_Plus_2 microarray. The DRP is based on correlations of in-vitro cytotoxicity to 5-FU and consequently correlations to mRNA expression of 3.500 tumors and evaluated blinded to outcome. Primary outcome was progression-free-survival (PFS) at 3 years after treatment with FLV. In addition to variables in the table, right vs left colon cancer vs rectal cancer, age, gender and surgery elective or acute were assessed in the multivariate model. Treatments in the metastatic setting included oxaliplatin and irinotecan from year 2000. To correct for possible selection bias for FLV-treatment, we corrected for treatment year 2000 in the analysis plan.
Results
The DRP was able to predict benefit of FLV in patients treated after 2000 (n = 73) with a univariate hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.93, p = 0.023) for a 50% difference of the DRP. For patients treated before 2000 results were not statistically significant. In the Cox model including all variables, a DRP score of 90 corresponds to a 50% likelihood of 9 months PFS and a score of 32 corresponds to a PFS of 6 months.Table:
644P Multivariate analysis of PFS
Variable | Level | HR | 95%-CI | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
DRP, difference of 50 | Treatment before 2000 | 1.24 | 0.52-3.03 | 0.63 |
Treatment after 2000 | 0.47 | 0.28-0.78 | 0.004 | |
Grade of differentiation | Medium + high vs low | 0.48 | 0.29-0.80 | 0.005 |
Mucinous vs low | 0.32 | 0.13-0.83 | 0.019 | |
Performance status | 2 vs 0-1 | 2.65 | 1.41-4.97 | 0.002 |
Conclusions
In patients treated with 5-FU after 2000 the DRP appears to predict benefit. There are no obvious reasons for the lack of prediction before 2000 but options include mRNA degradation, change in handling of samples, or the selection of older patients after 2000. [1] PLOS ONE; 11(5): e0155123.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Oncology Venture.
Funding
Oncology Venture.
Disclosure
I.K. Buhl: Full / Part-time employment, Shareholder (immediate family): Oncology Venture. B. Gustavsson: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Isofol. I.J. Christensen: Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Oncology Venture. A. Hansen: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Oncology Venture. S. Knudsen: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Oncology Venture. P.B. Jensen: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Oncology Venture. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5203 - Novel fusion genes identified from matched primary and recurred breast cancers by RNA-sequencing
Presenter: Soojeong Choi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5873 - Association between PIK3CA mutation status and development of brain metastases in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Donna Fitzgerald
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3588 - The role of AXL as mechanism of resistance to trastuzumab and a prognostic factor in breast cancer HER2 positive: a translational approach.
Presenter: Anna Adam-Artigues
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5640 - Untargeted assessment of tumor fractions in plasma for monitoring and prognostication from metastatic breast cancer patients undergoing systemic treatment
Presenter: Marija Balic
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2616 - Clinical application of mutational analysis in breast cancer patients: the relevance of PIK3CA analysis for precision medicine.
Presenter: Juan Miguel Cejalvo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3870 - A retrospective gene expression analysis of surgically-removed Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis (BCBM)
Presenter: Meritxell Mallafré-Larrosa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1240 - Endocrine therapy alone versus targeted combination strategy as first line treatment in elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: meta-analysis of Phase II and III randomized clinical trials
Presenter: Claudia Omarini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5535 - Alpelisib (ALP) + fulvestrant (FUL) for patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC): management and time course of key adverse events of special interest (AESIs) in SOLAR-1
Presenter: Hope Rugo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3093 - Changes in Hormone-Receptor status in Luminal breast cancers between primary tumor and metastases: results of the observational cohort GIM-13 AMBRA Study
Presenter: Marina Cazzaniga
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1378 - MONARCH 3: Updated time to chemotherapy and disease progression following abemaciclib plus aromatase inhibitor (AI) in HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC)
Presenter: Miguel Martín
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract