Abstract 5330
Background
No biomarkers predict efficacy of 5-FU for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A gene expression based drug response predictor (DRP) had been shown to predict benefit of 5-FU in the PETACC-3 cohort [1]. The current study aimed to validate the biomarker in a cohort of mCRC patients.
Methods
100 mCRC patients treated with 5-FU and leucovorin (FLV) at Sahlgrenska University Hospital from 1996-2013 had mRNA isolated from pretreatment formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue and run on Affymetrix HG-133_Plus_2 microarray. The DRP is based on correlations of in-vitro cytotoxicity to 5-FU and consequently correlations to mRNA expression of 3.500 tumors and evaluated blinded to outcome. Primary outcome was progression-free-survival (PFS) at 3 years after treatment with FLV. In addition to variables in the table, right vs left colon cancer vs rectal cancer, age, gender and surgery elective or acute were assessed in the multivariate model. Treatments in the metastatic setting included oxaliplatin and irinotecan from year 2000. To correct for possible selection bias for FLV-treatment, we corrected for treatment year 2000 in the analysis plan.
Results
The DRP was able to predict benefit of FLV in patients treated after 2000 (n = 73) with a univariate hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.93, p = 0.023) for a 50% difference of the DRP. For patients treated before 2000 results were not statistically significant. In the Cox model including all variables, a DRP score of 90 corresponds to a 50% likelihood of 9 months PFS and a score of 32 corresponds to a PFS of 6 months.Table:
644P Multivariate analysis of PFS
Variable | Level | HR | 95%-CI | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
DRP, difference of 50 | Treatment before 2000 | 1.24 | 0.52-3.03 | 0.63 |
Treatment after 2000 | 0.47 | 0.28-0.78 | 0.004 | |
Grade of differentiation | Medium + high vs low | 0.48 | 0.29-0.80 | 0.005 |
Mucinous vs low | 0.32 | 0.13-0.83 | 0.019 | |
Performance status | 2 vs 0-1 | 2.65 | 1.41-4.97 | 0.002 |
Conclusions
In patients treated with 5-FU after 2000 the DRP appears to predict benefit. There are no obvious reasons for the lack of prediction before 2000 but options include mRNA degradation, change in handling of samples, or the selection of older patients after 2000. [1] PLOS ONE; 11(5): e0155123.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Oncology Venture.
Funding
Oncology Venture.
Disclosure
I.K. Buhl: Full / Part-time employment, Shareholder (immediate family): Oncology Venture. B. Gustavsson: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Isofol. I.J. Christensen: Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Oncology Venture. A. Hansen: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Oncology Venture. S. Knudsen: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Oncology Venture. P.B. Jensen: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Oncology Venture. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2376 - Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in patients (pts) with HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm) receiving talazoparib (TALA) vs physician’s choice chemotherapy (PCT) in the EMBRACA trial: A focus on subgroups with/ without visceral disease
Presenter: Johannes Ettl
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4874 - Complete Responses in Patients With 2nd-Line or Greater Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Following First-in-Human Immunotherapy Combining NK and T Cell Activation with Off-the-Shelf High-Affinity CD16 NK Cell Line (haNK)
Presenter: Chaitali Nangia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4362 - Reproducibility and concordance of 4 clinically developed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)
Presenter: Aurelia Noske
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4528 - Systemic Therapy in 2nd-Line Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC): A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Meta-Analysis (MA) of Efficacy
Presenter: Peter Kaufman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4112 - Cisplatin given at three divided doses for three consecutive days in metastatic breast cancer: an alternative schedule for one full dose with comparable efficacy but less CINV and hypomagnesaemia
Presenter: Yang Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5699 - Patterns and predictors of first-line (1L) taxane use in US patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)
Presenter: Joyce O’Shaughnessy
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1931 - Maintenance Chemotherapy is effective in Patients with Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer After First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy
Presenter: Jian Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4696 - Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to investigate symptom burden enrichment in Stage IV patients at an academic center
Presenter: Madeline Matthys
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4582 - Measures of functional status in adults aged ≥70 years with advanced breast cancer (ABC) receiving palbociclib (PAL) combination therapy in POLARIS
Presenter: Meghan Karuturi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3565 - Real-World 1-Year Survival Analysis of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer with Liver or Lung Metastasis Treated with Eribulin, Gemcitabine or Capecitabine
Presenter: Shayma Kazmi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract