Abstract 5330
Background
No biomarkers predict efficacy of 5-FU for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A gene expression based drug response predictor (DRP) had been shown to predict benefit of 5-FU in the PETACC-3 cohort [1]. The current study aimed to validate the biomarker in a cohort of mCRC patients.
Methods
100 mCRC patients treated with 5-FU and leucovorin (FLV) at Sahlgrenska University Hospital from 1996-2013 had mRNA isolated from pretreatment formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue and run on Affymetrix HG-133_Plus_2 microarray. The DRP is based on correlations of in-vitro cytotoxicity to 5-FU and consequently correlations to mRNA expression of 3.500 tumors and evaluated blinded to outcome. Primary outcome was progression-free-survival (PFS) at 3 years after treatment with FLV. In addition to variables in the table, right vs left colon cancer vs rectal cancer, age, gender and surgery elective or acute were assessed in the multivariate model. Treatments in the metastatic setting included oxaliplatin and irinotecan from year 2000. To correct for possible selection bias for FLV-treatment, we corrected for treatment year 2000 in the analysis plan.
Results
The DRP was able to predict benefit of FLV in patients treated after 2000 (n = 73) with a univariate hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.93, p = 0.023) for a 50% difference of the DRP. For patients treated before 2000 results were not statistically significant. In the Cox model including all variables, a DRP score of 90 corresponds to a 50% likelihood of 9 months PFS and a score of 32 corresponds to a PFS of 6 months.Table:
644P Multivariate analysis of PFS
Variable | Level | HR | 95%-CI | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
DRP, difference of 50 | Treatment before 2000 | 1.24 | 0.52-3.03 | 0.63 |
Treatment after 2000 | 0.47 | 0.28-0.78 | 0.004 | |
Grade of differentiation | Medium + high vs low | 0.48 | 0.29-0.80 | 0.005 |
Mucinous vs low | 0.32 | 0.13-0.83 | 0.019 | |
Performance status | 2 vs 0-1 | 2.65 | 1.41-4.97 | 0.002 |
Conclusions
In patients treated with 5-FU after 2000 the DRP appears to predict benefit. There are no obvious reasons for the lack of prediction before 2000 but options include mRNA degradation, change in handling of samples, or the selection of older patients after 2000. [1] PLOS ONE; 11(5): e0155123.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Oncology Venture.
Funding
Oncology Venture.
Disclosure
I.K. Buhl: Full / Part-time employment, Shareholder (immediate family): Oncology Venture. B. Gustavsson: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Isofol. I.J. Christensen: Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Oncology Venture. A. Hansen: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Oncology Venture. S. Knudsen: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Oncology Venture. P.B. Jensen: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Oncology Venture. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2674 - Multicenter Phase I Trial of Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) in Combination with Non-Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (NPLD) in HER2[+] Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC). THELMA Study
Presenter: Elena López-Miranda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1398 - Phase 1 study of liposomal formulation of eribulin (E7389-LF) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: primary results of dose-escalation part
Presenter: Noboru Yamamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5818 - Polo-like Kinase 1 inhibitor onvansertib synergizes with paclitaxel in breast cancer carrying p53 mutation
Presenter: Antonio Giordano
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5927 - Phase 1b study of heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, onalespib in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced, triple negative breast cancer (NCT02474173).
Presenter: Robert Wesolowski
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1695 - Impact of pertuzumab and T-DM1 on prognosis of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and factors affecting their efficacy: results from the AGMT_MBC-Registry
Presenter: Simon Peter Gampenrieder
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1742 - Clinical profile and outcome of HER2 positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases treated with HER2 targeted therapy: Real world experience.
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1846 - Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: results of single arm phase IV COMACHI study
Presenter: Norikazu Masuda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5385 - Anti HER-2 Therapies and Left Ventricular Dysfunction The Renaissance Study
Presenter: ANDRES DANIELE
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3320 - Safety and efficacy of T-DM1 in 128 patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer: The Royal Marsden experience.
Presenter: Nicolò Battisti
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4540 - Use of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; K) after pertuzumab + trastuzumab (PH) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC): challenges in assessing effectiveness of treatment sequencing in the real world (RW)
Presenter: Thibaut Sanglier
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract