Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4852 - Impact of routine screening and preemptive treatment on hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) in patients receiving chemotherapy
Presenter: Celine Marty
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5225 - The uptake, patient satisfaction and efficacy of scalp cooling among patients receiving chemotherapy in an Irish oncology day ward.
Presenter: William Maher
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1901 - Placebo adverse events (AEs) in targeted and immune cancer therapy in the adjuvant and advanced setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Diego Enrico
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3258 - Reduced antibody levels and high seronegativity rates against vaccine preventable diseases pose a risk factor for infections in patients with solid and hematologic cancers
Presenter: Angela Guzek
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3211 - Prognostic Factors Influencing Outcome After Therapy With Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Presenter: Veselina Goranova - Marinova
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4949 - Phase I Study of CC-90010 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R NHL)
Presenter: Victor Moreno
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2271 - Pretreatment coagulation factors related to prognosis in patients with natural killer/T cell lymphoma
Presenter: Yue Chai
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4335 - Diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the elderly. A retrospective analysis of standard versus alternative treatments
Presenter: Irene Sillero
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5117 - MIPI as a superior prognostic tool in Mantle Cell Lymphoma compared to monocyte-lymphocyte, neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios
Presenter: Filipa Macedo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5135 - Dose adjustment of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma using automated and standardized analysis and evaluation of DNA double strand breaks
Presenter: Julia Schröder
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract