Abstract 5370
Background
Pan FGFR inhibitors such as Erdafitinib are approved in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) harboring FGFR alterations. Based on the necessity of sensitive and reproducible identification of these alterations in diagnostic routines this study aimed to compare different RNA isolation techniques and the QIAGEN therascreen® FGFR RGQ RT-PCR Kit with the SNaPshot mutational analysis.
Methods
Nucleic acids were extracted from 47 UC patients using the QIAGEN RNeasy® DSP FFPE Kit, STRATIFYER Xtract or Maxwell RNA (Promega) isolation kit. Mutations of the FGFR3 gene were detected using the SNaPshot method as well as via the QIAGEN therascreen® FGFR RGQ RT-PCR Kit. Intrinsic molecular subtypes were assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) of GATA3, FOXA1, CK20, CK5 and CD44 as well as RT-qPCR for gene expression of CK20 and CK5.
Results
All three different RNA isolation kits showed comparable amount of extracted RNA (Median 290, 177 and 226 ng/ul). Six hotspot FGFR3 mutations were identified with 100% concordance. The main difference were the necessary working hours: per 10 samples, 4 vs. 4.5 vs 8 hours were needed for Stratifyer, Maxwell or QIAGEN RNA isolation. In addition, of 47 analyzed samples 100% concordance between QIAGEN therascreen® FGFR RGQ RT-PCR Kit and SNapShot analysis were achieved with 18 mutations identified (14 S249C, 2 R248C and 2 Y375). Immunohistochemical basal marker profile (CD44 and CK5) as well as high CK5 expression was observed in 28 (6/28 FGFR3-altered). Luminal marker profile (IHC markers: GATA3, FOXA1 and CK20 as well as expression of CK20) was detected in 37 samples (5/37 with FGFR3 alteration, n.s.).
Conclusions
Different RNA extraction methods presented with comparable amount of nucleic acids with variant working hours. Moreover, a 100% concordance between the well established SNaPshot analysis compared to the QIAGEN therascreen® FGFR RGQ RT-PCR Kit for FGFR3 mutations was observed. So far, the frequency of FGFR3 mutations in aUC was not related to the type of UC as defined by marker profils.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
BRIDGE consortium.
Funding
Janssen.
Disclosure
R. Wirtz: Officer / Board of Directors: Stratifyer. M. Eckstein: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen. A. Hartmann: Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3252 - Genes involved in DNA replication, chromatin remodeling and cell cycle as potential biomarkers for therapy outcome to immune therapy in patients with metastatic cutaneous malignant melanoma
Presenter: Fernanda Costa Svedman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5545 - Phase Ib/II Study (SENSITIZE) assessing safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical outcome of domatinostat in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma refractory/non-responding to prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy
Presenter: Jessica Hassel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5213 - Genomic landscape of primary malignant melanoma of esophagus
Presenter: Jie Dai
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2716 - A phase III, randomised, double-blind study of adjuvant cemiplimab versus placebo post-surgery and radiation in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC)
Presenter: Danny Rischin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3550 - ILLUMINATE 301: A randomized phase 3 study of tilsotolimod in combination with ipilimumab compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma following progression on or after anti-PD-1 therapy
Presenter: Marcus Butler
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1645 - PRIME002 - Early phase II study of Azacitidine and Carboplatin priming for Avelumab in patients with advanced melanoma who are resistant to immunotherapy
Presenter: Andre Van Der Westhuizen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4440 - Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Lenvatinib (len) for First-Line Treatment of patients (pts) With Advanced Melanoma: Phase 3 LEAP-003 Study
Presenter: Alexander Eggermont
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3454 - Proof of concept study with the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in patients with resistant BRAFV600 mutated advanced melanoma
Presenter: Sanne Huijberts
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1832 - A phase Ia/Ib clinical study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary anti-tumor activity of FCN-159 in patients with advanced melanoma harboring NRAS-aberrant (Ia) and NRAS-mutation (Ib).
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3996 - A Phase I Clinical Trial Investigating the Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine UV1 in Combination with Pembrolizumab as First-Line Treatment of Patients with Malignant Melanoma
Presenter: Sanjiv Agarwala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract