Abstract 5370
Background
Pan FGFR inhibitors such as Erdafitinib are approved in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) harboring FGFR alterations. Based on the necessity of sensitive and reproducible identification of these alterations in diagnostic routines this study aimed to compare different RNA isolation techniques and the QIAGEN therascreen® FGFR RGQ RT-PCR Kit with the SNaPshot mutational analysis.
Methods
Nucleic acids were extracted from 47 UC patients using the QIAGEN RNeasy® DSP FFPE Kit, STRATIFYER Xtract or Maxwell RNA (Promega) isolation kit. Mutations of the FGFR3 gene were detected using the SNaPshot method as well as via the QIAGEN therascreen® FGFR RGQ RT-PCR Kit. Intrinsic molecular subtypes were assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) of GATA3, FOXA1, CK20, CK5 and CD44 as well as RT-qPCR for gene expression of CK20 and CK5.
Results
All three different RNA isolation kits showed comparable amount of extracted RNA (Median 290, 177 and 226 ng/ul). Six hotspot FGFR3 mutations were identified with 100% concordance. The main difference were the necessary working hours: per 10 samples, 4 vs. 4.5 vs 8 hours were needed for Stratifyer, Maxwell or QIAGEN RNA isolation. In addition, of 47 analyzed samples 100% concordance between QIAGEN therascreen® FGFR RGQ RT-PCR Kit and SNapShot analysis were achieved with 18 mutations identified (14 S249C, 2 R248C and 2 Y375). Immunohistochemical basal marker profile (CD44 and CK5) as well as high CK5 expression was observed in 28 (6/28 FGFR3-altered). Luminal marker profile (IHC markers: GATA3, FOXA1 and CK20 as well as expression of CK20) was detected in 37 samples (5/37 with FGFR3 alteration, n.s.).
Conclusions
Different RNA extraction methods presented with comparable amount of nucleic acids with variant working hours. Moreover, a 100% concordance between the well established SNaPshot analysis compared to the QIAGEN therascreen® FGFR RGQ RT-PCR Kit for FGFR3 mutations was observed. So far, the frequency of FGFR3 mutations in aUC was not related to the type of UC as defined by marker profils.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
BRIDGE consortium.
Funding
Janssen.
Disclosure
R. Wirtz: Officer / Board of Directors: Stratifyer. M. Eckstein: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen. A. Hartmann: Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2743 - The Impact of Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy in Melanoma Brain Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Presenter: Mario Mandala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5479 - Intracranial Anti-Tumor Activity in Melanoma Brain Metastases with Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib: A Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis
Presenter: Jose Lutzky
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3560 - Outcomes of Patients with Melanoma Brain Metastases (MBM) Treated with Standard of Care Therapy After Being Excluded from MBM-Specific Clinical Trials
Presenter: Kourtney Holbrook
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3175 - The analysis of current treatment outcomes in melanoma patients with brain metastases
Presenter: Joanna Placzke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4550 - A multivariate model to define prognostic groups among patients with melanoma brain metastases: a 10-year retrospective cohort study
Presenter: Giacomo Pelizzari
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4191 - The immune landscape of melanoma significantly influences survival in patients with highly mutated tumors.
Presenter: Robert Ferguson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1625 - Final Results from Phase II of Combination with Canerpaturev (formerly HF10), an Oncolytic Viral Immunotherapy, and Ipilimumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma in 2nd-or later line treatment
Presenter: Kenji Yokota
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5346 - Evaluating polygenic risk score prediction model for melanoma prognosis
Presenter: Miriam Potrony
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5477 - Impact of sarcopenia in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy
Presenter: Maria Grazia Vitale
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3469 - Ancillary evaluation of systemic immune antitumor response (SIAR) and tumor growth rate (TGR) of patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM) treated with radiotherapy (RT) combined with ipilimumab (ipi) in the phase 1 study Mel-Ipi-Rx.
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract