Abstract 5370
Background
Pan FGFR inhibitors such as Erdafitinib are approved in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) harboring FGFR alterations. Based on the necessity of sensitive and reproducible identification of these alterations in diagnostic routines this study aimed to compare different RNA isolation techniques and the QIAGEN therascreen® FGFR RGQ RT-PCR Kit with the SNaPshot mutational analysis.
Methods
Nucleic acids were extracted from 47 UC patients using the QIAGEN RNeasy® DSP FFPE Kit, STRATIFYER Xtract or Maxwell RNA (Promega) isolation kit. Mutations of the FGFR3 gene were detected using the SNaPshot method as well as via the QIAGEN therascreen® FGFR RGQ RT-PCR Kit. Intrinsic molecular subtypes were assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) of GATA3, FOXA1, CK20, CK5 and CD44 as well as RT-qPCR for gene expression of CK20 and CK5.
Results
All three different RNA isolation kits showed comparable amount of extracted RNA (Median 290, 177 and 226 ng/ul). Six hotspot FGFR3 mutations were identified with 100% concordance. The main difference were the necessary working hours: per 10 samples, 4 vs. 4.5 vs 8 hours were needed for Stratifyer, Maxwell or QIAGEN RNA isolation. In addition, of 47 analyzed samples 100% concordance between QIAGEN therascreen® FGFR RGQ RT-PCR Kit and SNapShot analysis were achieved with 18 mutations identified (14 S249C, 2 R248C and 2 Y375). Immunohistochemical basal marker profile (CD44 and CK5) as well as high CK5 expression was observed in 28 (6/28 FGFR3-altered). Luminal marker profile (IHC markers: GATA3, FOXA1 and CK20 as well as expression of CK20) was detected in 37 samples (5/37 with FGFR3 alteration, n.s.).
Conclusions
Different RNA extraction methods presented with comparable amount of nucleic acids with variant working hours. Moreover, a 100% concordance between the well established SNaPshot analysis compared to the QIAGEN therascreen® FGFR RGQ RT-PCR Kit for FGFR3 mutations was observed. So far, the frequency of FGFR3 mutations in aUC was not related to the type of UC as defined by marker profils.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
BRIDGE consortium.
Funding
Janssen.
Disclosure
R. Wirtz: Officer / Board of Directors: Stratifyer. M. Eckstein: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen. A. Hartmann: Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4543 - Long-term real-world (RW) outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma (MEL) treated with ipilimumab (IPI) and non-IPI therapies: IMAGE study
Presenter: Stéphane Dalle
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4523 - Prognostic Factors for efficacy of Ipilimumab used after AntiPD1 and/or BRAF+MEK inhibitors in Melanoma Patients: an Italian Melanoma Intergroup study
Presenter: Riccardo Marconcini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3632 - Rechallenge with combination ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 (IPI+PD1) in metastatic melanoma after acquired resistance to IPI+PD1 immunotherapy
Presenter: Adriana Hepner
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3732 - Clinicopathologic characteristics of immune colitis in melanoma patients treated with combination ipilimumab and anti-PD1 (IPI+PD1) and PD1 monotherapy.
Presenter: Kazi Nahar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5005 - Real-world outcomes of ipilimumab plus nivolumab for advanced melanoma in the Netherlands
Presenter: Michiel van Zeijl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5524 - Utilization of Real-World Data to Assess the Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Presenter: D Scott Ernst
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5884 - Tumor mutational burden and response to PD-1 inhibitors: an analysis of 89 cases of metastatic melanoma.
Presenter: Léa Dousset
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3120 - Increase in S100B and LDH as early outcome predictors for non-responsiveness to anti-PD-1 monotherapy in advanced melanoma.
Presenter: Elisa Rozeman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2157 - Immune status defined by molecular information layers predicts response to pembrolizumab treatment in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Guillermo Prado-Vázquez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2553 - Interim analysis of a phase Ib study of cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in patients with advanced BRAFV600 wild type melanoma progressing on prior anti-PD-L1 therapy
Presenter: Shahneen Sandhu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract