Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session 1

5189 - Association between serum HGF levels and neutrophil counts in small cell lung cancer and their impact on survival

Date

28 Sep 2019

Session

Poster Display session 1

Topics

Tumour Site

Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Laura Moliner

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v710-v717. 10.1093/annonc/mdz264

Authors

L. Moliner1, M. Hardy-Werbin2, X. Duran2, O. Arpí2, Á. Taus1, P. Rocha1, R. Del Rey2, M.A. Galindo-Campos2, A. Rovira1, J. Albanell3, E. Arriola1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Departament., University Hospital del Mar, 08003 - Barcelona/ES
  • 2 Cancer Research Program, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), 08003 - Barcelona/ES
  • 3 Medical Oncology Departament., University Hospital del Mar. Center for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC), 8003 - Barcelona/ES

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 5189

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly lethal disease. Recently, immunotherapy has demonstrated a benefit for a subgroup of patients beyond the second-line and in the first-line setting combined with chemotherapy. However, the majority of patients will not benefit and predictive biomarkers are urgently needed. High baseline neutrophil count (NC) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are unfavorable prognostic factors in SCLC and might also predict for lack of response to immunotherapy. There is data suggesting that activation of the HGF/MET pathway might contribute to the recruitment of immunosuppressor neutrophils in the tumor. Our aim was to evaluate the association between HGF serum levels (sHGF) and NC in SCLC and their impact on outcome.

Methods

Serum samples from SCLC patients were obtained before starting first-line treatment. We used the Quantikine Human HGF Immunoassay to quantify sHGF. All samples were run in duplicates. NC and NLR were obtained from blood test reports before treatment initiation. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 22.0 and Prism 8.1.0. Correlation of variables was assessed by the Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Multivariate analysis was performed with the Cox regression method.

Results

Samples from 105 patients diagnosed with SCLC at our institution were included. 79.1% of the cases were male, 73.3% with extensive stage, and 31.4% had an ECOG score of ≥ 2. Median sHGF, NC and NLR were 1875.38pg/ml, 6440/µl and 5.1 respectively. Patients with baseline NLR > 4 or NC above median had worse median overall survival (mOS), with 7.9 vs 15.3 months (m) (p < 0.001) and 7.2 vs 15.3m (p < 0.001) respectively. sHGF above median values was also correlated with worse mOS (7.6 vs 12.8 m; p = 0.005). Baseline sHGF levels were positively correlated with NC (r = 0.34, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis for OS, sHGF and NC remained independently associated with poor outcome (HR 1.094; p = 0.001 and HR 1.18; p = 0.003 respectively).

Conclusions

Baseline HGF levels correlate with NC in SCLC, reinforcing the hypothesis of a plausible interplay between HGF/MET axis and the immune system. The role of these parameters as predictive biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in SCLC warrants further investigation.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

E. Arriola: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: BMS; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MSD; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): PGDx; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Lilly. All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.