Abstract 4370
Background
In the multi-center investigator-initiated OpACIN-neo trial, patients (pts) with macroscopic stage III melanoma were randomized (stratified by center) to 3 different dosing schemes of neoadjuvant (neoadj) IPI+NIVO. Two cycles IPI 1mg/kg + NIVO3 mg/kg was identified as the most favorable regimen with 20% grade 3-4 adverse events and a pathological response rate (pRR) of 77%. After a median follow-up (FU) of 8.3 months (mo) none (0/86) of the pts with a pathologic (path) response had relapsed, while 9/21 (43%) without a path response relapsed. Post-hoc analyses were conducted to investigate potential differences between pts treated in Europe (EU) and in Australia (AUS).
Methods
Baseline patient characteristics, safety and efficacy in terms of path response were evaluated in pts treated in EU (n = 48) and AUS (n = 38). Multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression method. Median FU was 9.3mo for EU pts and 6.9mo for AUS pts.
Results
Baseline characteristics (AUS vs EU) differed in age (median 60 vs 53 year [yr], p = 0.017) and AUS pts were more likely to be male (65.8 vs 50.0%, p = 0.142) and have an unknown primary melanoma (36.8 vs 20.8%, p = 0.100); no difference in PD-L1 expression was observed. There was a trend to a higher pRR for AUS pts than for EU pts (84.2% vs 68.1%, OR 2.50, p = 0.092). pRR was also higher for pts >60 yr compared to £60 yr (91.2% vs 64.7%, OR 5.64, p = 0.010) and males vs females (83.7% vs 63.9%, OR 2.90, p = 0.041). Multivariate analysis including continent, age and gender showed an adjusted OR for path response of 1.85 (p = 0.289) for AUS vs EU pts, an OR of 4.89 (p = 0.021) for pts >60yrs vs £60yrs and an OR of 2.50 (p = 0.095) for males vs females. The frequency of high grade toxicity was the same in pts <60 compared to pts >60 yr (42.3% vs 32.4%, p = 0.353).
Conclusions
The continental difference in path response appears mostly driven by differences in age and gender. It remains to be elucidated whether the higher pRRs in elderly pts and pts from AUS can be explained by differences in mutational burden (analysis in progress and will be presented). Our data also indicate that neoadj IPI+NIVO is safe and highly effective in the elderly.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02977052.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Netherlands Cancer Institute.
Funding
BMS.
Disclosure
E.A. Rozeman: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: NanoString. A.M. Menzies: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. R.A. Scolyer: Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Neracare; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. A.C.J. van Akkooi: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck-Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: 4SC. J. Hansson: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. G.V. Long: Advisory / Consultancy: Aduro; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Mass-Array; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. C.U. Blank: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Advisory / Consultancy: GenMab; Research grant / Funding (institution): NanoString. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1122 - Platelets from metastatic cancer patients have increased aggregation and activation
Presenter: Meera Chauhan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2671 - Luminal B breast cancer prognosis prediction by comprehensive analysis of Homeobox genes
Presenter: Ayako Nakashoji
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2650 - Long non-coding RNA E2F4as promotes tumor progression and predicts patient prognosis in human ovarian cancer
Presenter: Sun-Ae Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1462 - FGF19 promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression by inhibiting autophagy
Presenter: Lisha Ying
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5787 - Proof of concept on the role of ex vivo lung cancer spheroids, cytokines expression and PBMCs profiling in monitoring disease history and response to treatments.
Presenter: Raimondo Di Liello
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5253 - Circulating microRNAs related to DNA damage response as predictors of survival in metastatic non- small cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy
Presenter: Dimitris Mavroudis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5286 - Prognostic value of CTCs in advanced NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy
Presenter: Silvia Calabuig-Fariñas
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5781 - Exosomes in NSCLC as a source of biomarkers
Presenter: Elena Duréndez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1447 - The role of Pim-1 in the development and progression of papillary thyroid carcinoma
Presenter: Xin Zhu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1323 - Development and Validation of a RNA-Seq Based Prognostic Signature in Neuroblastoma
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract