Abstract 4370
Background
In the multi-center investigator-initiated OpACIN-neo trial, patients (pts) with macroscopic stage III melanoma were randomized (stratified by center) to 3 different dosing schemes of neoadjuvant (neoadj) IPI+NIVO. Two cycles IPI 1mg/kg + NIVO3 mg/kg was identified as the most favorable regimen with 20% grade 3-4 adverse events and a pathological response rate (pRR) of 77%. After a median follow-up (FU) of 8.3 months (mo) none (0/86) of the pts with a pathologic (path) response had relapsed, while 9/21 (43%) without a path response relapsed. Post-hoc analyses were conducted to investigate potential differences between pts treated in Europe (EU) and in Australia (AUS).
Methods
Baseline patient characteristics, safety and efficacy in terms of path response were evaluated in pts treated in EU (n = 48) and AUS (n = 38). Multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression method. Median FU was 9.3mo for EU pts and 6.9mo for AUS pts.
Results
Baseline characteristics (AUS vs EU) differed in age (median 60 vs 53 year [yr], p = 0.017) and AUS pts were more likely to be male (65.8 vs 50.0%, p = 0.142) and have an unknown primary melanoma (36.8 vs 20.8%, p = 0.100); no difference in PD-L1 expression was observed. There was a trend to a higher pRR for AUS pts than for EU pts (84.2% vs 68.1%, OR 2.50, p = 0.092). pRR was also higher for pts >60 yr compared to £60 yr (91.2% vs 64.7%, OR 5.64, p = 0.010) and males vs females (83.7% vs 63.9%, OR 2.90, p = 0.041). Multivariate analysis including continent, age and gender showed an adjusted OR for path response of 1.85 (p = 0.289) for AUS vs EU pts, an OR of 4.89 (p = 0.021) for pts >60yrs vs £60yrs and an OR of 2.50 (p = 0.095) for males vs females. The frequency of high grade toxicity was the same in pts <60 compared to pts >60 yr (42.3% vs 32.4%, p = 0.353).
Conclusions
The continental difference in path response appears mostly driven by differences in age and gender. It remains to be elucidated whether the higher pRRs in elderly pts and pts from AUS can be explained by differences in mutational burden (analysis in progress and will be presented). Our data also indicate that neoadj IPI+NIVO is safe and highly effective in the elderly.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02977052.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Netherlands Cancer Institute.
Funding
BMS.
Disclosure
E.A. Rozeman: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: NanoString. A.M. Menzies: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. R.A. Scolyer: Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Neracare; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. A.C.J. van Akkooi: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck-Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: 4SC. J. Hansson: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. G.V. Long: Advisory / Consultancy: Aduro; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Mass-Array; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. C.U. Blank: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Advisory / Consultancy: GenMab; Research grant / Funding (institution): NanoString. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4634 - Comparative molecular analyses between microsatellite stable BRAFV600E mutant colorectal cancers and BRAFV600E mutant melanomas.
Presenter: Mohamed Salem
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3264 - A novel preclinical model of RAF-independent MEK1 mutant tumors and its treatment with novel ATP competitive MEK inhibitor
Presenter: Luca Hegedus
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4918 - HER2 inhibition in Aggressive Squamous Cell Carcinomas driven by a common MET Sema Domain Polymorphism
Presenter: Nur Afiqah Mohamed Salleh
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2426 - ADAM9 as a target for lung cancer treatment
Presenter: Yuh-pyng Sher
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5537 - Novel polyurea/polyurethane nanocapsules loaded with a tambjamine analog to improve cancer chemotherapy delivery and safety in lung cancer
Presenter: Marta Perez Hernandez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1597 - Discovery of Clinical Candidate DBPR112, a Furanopyrimidine-based Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Presenter: Hsing-pang Hsieh
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3543 - Molecular characteristics in lung squamous cell carcinomas dependent on TP53 status – putative targets
Presenter: Vilde Haakensen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4111 - Comparison of molecular profiles between primary tumour and matched metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Asuka Kawachi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4559 - Treatment with BLU-667, a potent and selective RET inhibitor, provides rapid clearance of ctDNA in Patients with RET-altered Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Thyroid Cancer
Presenter: Giuseppe Curigliano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2501 - Triple MET/SRC/PIM inhibition in MET addicted tumors
Presenter: Ilaria Attili
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract