Abstract 4442
Background
Real-world (rw) evidence derived from electronic health records (EHRs) is being explored for use as a comparator to single arm clinical trials in oncology. While RECIST is a standard for assessing tumor response in trials, alternative approaches are needed in rw cohorts. Our objective was to examine whether rwRR derived from abstracted “real-world tumor response” (rwTR) might perform similarly to RECIST-based response rates in a variety of settings to support assessments of drug efficacy.
Methods
We focused on randomized clinical trials supporting FDA approvals in aNSCLC between 2015-2017 (4 trials, 5 arms). We selected rw cohorts of aNSCLC patients from de-identified Flatiron Health EHR-derived database by applying the eligibility criteria of each trial as feasible, following an established internal process; trials were considered infeasible for comparison and not reported when fewer than 30 eligible rw patients were identified at the time of analyses. rwTR was abstracted from unstructured clinical notes and was based on the treating oncologist’s assessment of disease change (e.g., partial response) indicated by imaging at each point of radiographic disease evaluation. We compared the rwRRs observed in rw cohorts to objective response rates (ORRs) from trials.
Results
rw cohorts included 862 patients, and clinical trial cohorts (2 control arms and 3 experimental arms) included 701 patients, see response rates in the table (all except ALEX were confirmed RRs).Table:
1581P
Trial | Trial arm | ORR | rwRR |
---|---|---|---|
CheckMate-017 | E: Nivolumab / 2L+ squamous | 20% (27/135) | 25% (17/68) |
CheckMate-057 | E: Nivolumab / 2L+ nonsquamous | 19% (56/292) | 17% (51/294) |
KEYNOTE-021 | E: Carboplatin, Pembrolizumab, Pemetrexed/ 1L nonsquamous | 55% (33/60) | 42% (37/88) |
KEYNOTE-021 | C: Carboplatin and Pemetrexed/ 1L nonsquamous | 29% (18/63) | 34% (101/294) |
ALEX | C: Crizotinib/ 1L | 75% (114/151) | 68% (80/118) |
Conclusions
Data curated from EHRs of rw patients with aNSCLC can provide estimates of response rates that are comparable to RECIST-based response rates observed in similar patient populations studied in clinical trial settings. These findings demonstrate the potential of leveraging rw cohorts as a comparator to single arm clinical trials in oncology.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Flatiron Health, Inc.
Funding
Flatiron Health Inc., independent subsidiary of the Roche group.
Disclosure
X. Ma: Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group.: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. N.C. Nussbaum: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group.: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. K. Magee: Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. A.B. Bourla: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. M. Tucker: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group.: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. L. Bellomo: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. C. Bennette: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group.: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche.
Resources from the same session
3345 - Escalation plans and DNACPR discussions in the unwell oncology patient
Presenter: Raghad Elghadi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4165 - The Relation between the Symptom Burden of Hospitalized Patients with Incurable Cancer and the Quality-of-Life of Their Family Caregivers
Presenter: Eman Tawfik
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1784 - Clinical predictors for analgesic response to radiotherapy in patients with painful bone metastases
Presenter: Ragnhild Habberstad
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5323 - 30-Day Mortality in Palliative Radiotherapy
Presenter: Shing Fung Lee
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3942 - The relationship between Naldemedine administration and the maximum dose of oral opioids
Presenter: Shinya Kajiura
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3698 - Exposure to low energy amplitude modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMF) is associated with rapid improvement in quality of life (QoL) status in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), using various analyses of EORTC-C30.
Presenter: Elizabeth Santana
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3885 - Olanzapine Combined with 5-HT3 RA Plus Dexamethasone for Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in High and Moderate Emetogenic Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5700 - Early Palliative care in advanced cancer, is it really effective?
Presenter: Raquel Gómez Bravo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5924 - Deprescribing Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Cancer Patients
Presenter: Simon Reuter
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5314 - Spirituality and religious coping for Cancer patients and providers: An ‘Almighty’ belief for palliative care
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract