Abstract 4442
Background
Real-world (rw) evidence derived from electronic health records (EHRs) is being explored for use as a comparator to single arm clinical trials in oncology. While RECIST is a standard for assessing tumor response in trials, alternative approaches are needed in rw cohorts. Our objective was to examine whether rwRR derived from abstracted “real-world tumor response” (rwTR) might perform similarly to RECIST-based response rates in a variety of settings to support assessments of drug efficacy.
Methods
We focused on randomized clinical trials supporting FDA approvals in aNSCLC between 2015-2017 (4 trials, 5 arms). We selected rw cohorts of aNSCLC patients from de-identified Flatiron Health EHR-derived database by applying the eligibility criteria of each trial as feasible, following an established internal process; trials were considered infeasible for comparison and not reported when fewer than 30 eligible rw patients were identified at the time of analyses. rwTR was abstracted from unstructured clinical notes and was based on the treating oncologist’s assessment of disease change (e.g., partial response) indicated by imaging at each point of radiographic disease evaluation. We compared the rwRRs observed in rw cohorts to objective response rates (ORRs) from trials.
Results
rw cohorts included 862 patients, and clinical trial cohorts (2 control arms and 3 experimental arms) included 701 patients, see response rates in the table (all except ALEX were confirmed RRs).Table:
1581P
Trial | Trial arm | ORR | rwRR |
---|---|---|---|
CheckMate-017 | E: Nivolumab / 2L+ squamous | 20% (27/135) | 25% (17/68) |
CheckMate-057 | E: Nivolumab / 2L+ nonsquamous | 19% (56/292) | 17% (51/294) |
KEYNOTE-021 | E: Carboplatin, Pembrolizumab, Pemetrexed/ 1L nonsquamous | 55% (33/60) | 42% (37/88) |
KEYNOTE-021 | C: Carboplatin and Pemetrexed/ 1L nonsquamous | 29% (18/63) | 34% (101/294) |
ALEX | C: Crizotinib/ 1L | 75% (114/151) | 68% (80/118) |
Conclusions
Data curated from EHRs of rw patients with aNSCLC can provide estimates of response rates that are comparable to RECIST-based response rates observed in similar patient populations studied in clinical trial settings. These findings demonstrate the potential of leveraging rw cohorts as a comparator to single arm clinical trials in oncology.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Flatiron Health, Inc.
Funding
Flatiron Health Inc., independent subsidiary of the Roche group.
Disclosure
X. Ma: Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group.: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. N.C. Nussbaum: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group.: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. K. Magee: Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. A.B. Bourla: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. M. Tucker: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group.: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. L. Bellomo: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. C. Bennette: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group.: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche.
Resources from the same session
4321 - Health-related quality of life of advanced melanoma survivors treated with CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibition: a matched cohort study
Presenter: Annelies Boekhout
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
779 - Capecitabine vs Cisplatin along with concurrent radiotherapy in the treatment of inoperable lower esophageal cancers focusing on TWISTT score and QOL
Presenter: Goutham Anugu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5914 - Cancer, Mental Health and End Life Simulation (CAMhELS): A novel effectiveness evaluation.
Presenter: Asanga Fernando
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2597 - Cancer patients’ expectations and understanding about their disease
Presenter: Mónica Pinho
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5187 - Impact of patients’ death on oncologists and coping strategies: An online survey
Presenter: Soumaya Labidi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4579 - Clinical benefit from late lines of therapy offered to patients treated in a tertiary referral centre
Presenter: Andrea Sbrana
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5058 - Preparedness for caregiving in caregivers of cancer patients
Presenter: Hatice Yakar
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5917 - Oncologic Emergency Medicine in the real world: A survey and proposal for improvement
Presenter: Carintia Dorta Pérez
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4077 - The Reality of Critical Cancer Patients in a Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit
Presenter: Tiago Filipe Da Cruz Tomas
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1728 - A phase III trial evaluating olanzapine 5 mg for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving cisplatin: J-FORCE Study
Presenter: Hironobu Hashimoto
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract