Abstract 133P
Background
The aim of this study was to compare the treatment failure patterns after laparoscopic (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).
Methods
A total of 1792 LAGC patients who underwent radical resection between January 2010 and December 2016 were divided into an LG group (n=1557) and OG group (n=235). Propensity score matching was performed to balance the two groups. Dynamic hazard rates of failure were calculated using the hazard function.
Results
A total of 1175 LAGC patients were included after matching (LG group, n=940; OG, n=235). The treatment failure rate of the whole group was 43.23% (508/1175), accounting for 41.38% (389/940) and 50.64% (119/235) in the LG and OG groups, respectively. The static treatment failure pattern showed that only distant recurrence rate of the LG group was significantly lower than that of the OG group (22.02% vs. 28.94%, P=0.025). Landmark analysis showed a lower early treatment failure rate of the LG group in stage Ib-IIIb subgroup (P=0.004). Furthermore, dynamic hazard curve peaked at 9.4 months (Peak rate=0.0186) and then gradually declined. For stage Ⅰb to Ⅲb patients, time of peak failure hazard was 5.2 months earlier in the OG group (OG versus LG: 11.0 versus 16.2 months). Finally, LG was an independent protective factor associated with early treatment failure in stage Ib-IIIb patients (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93; P=0.019).
Conclusions
Given the differences in treatment failure patterns between LG and OG, shorter-interval surveillance for the first 2 years should be considered for stage Ib-IIIb patients after OG.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
276P - Sarcopenia to predict overall survival in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Felix Kwenandar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
277P - Tegafur/uracil, platinum and cetuximab (UPEx) as first line treatment in frail patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Meng-che Hsieh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
278P - Serial assessment of parotid volume changes during radical chemoradiation of locally advanced head and neck cancer: Its implications in practice of adaptive radiotherapy
Presenter: Aathira T S
Session: e-Poster Display Session
279P - Clinico pathological characteristics and survival outcome in oral cavity cancer with masticator space involvement (T4b): A retrospective single institutional experience
Presenter: Abdulla Kunnummal Palathinkara
Session: e-Poster Display Session
280P - Safety and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancers in younger versus older patients: Post hoc analysis of a randomized control trial
Presenter: Vanita Noronha
Session: e-Poster Display Session
281P - Prevalence of premalignant lesions and oral cancer among tobacco-using tea plantation workers of Nilgiri Hills, Tamilnadu, India
Presenter: Delfin Lovelina Francis
Session: e-Poster Display Session
282P - Filipino head and neck cancer patients and their quality of life
Presenter: Frederic Ivan Ting
Session: e-Poster Display Session
283P - Descriptive epidemiology of head and neck cancer in Niger: First results from the National Cancer Registry
Presenter: Salamatou Mamoudou Garba
Session: e-Poster Display Session
284P - Outcomes of metronomic adjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur-uracil in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Tsung-jang Yeh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
285P - Comparison of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis
Presenter: Xu Guoqiang
Session: e-Poster Display Session