Abstract 412P
Background
A significant proportion of newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients does not receive a first-line platinum doublet due to unfavorable clinical characteristics.
Methods
We retrospectively collected data on 221 EGFR/ALK negative and PD-L1 <50% patients [median age 79 (range 56-92) years, M/F 165(74.6%)/56(25.4%), PS 0/1/≥2 23(10.4%)/94(42.5%)/103(47.1%), adenoK/squamous/large-cell/NOS 107(48.4%)/94(42.5%)/9(4.1%)/11(5%), median of 2 serious comorbidities] with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC treated with a first-line single agent. Clinicians were asked about the criteria according to which treatment selection was made and what percentage of patients did not receive a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
Results
A median of 25% (range 10%-30%) of newly diagnosed NSCLC did not receive a first-line platinum combination. The main clinical criteria according to which decision was made were older age (76.5%), comorbidities (72%), low PS (55.2%) and familiar or social issues (10%). Single-agent treatment consisted of gemcitabine (Gem 10%), oral standard vinorelbine (Vin 8.2%), oral metronomic vinorelbine (MetV 78.6%) and other (O 3.2%). Median time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of single agent treatments were Gem 4.5, Vin 4.5, MetV 5, O 5 months and Gem 9, Vin 9, MetV 10, O 10.5 months respectively. Overall grade 3-4 toxicities were lower with MetV (8%) than with Gem (13.6%), Vin (16.6%) and O (14.3%). Median TTP and OS without grade 3-4 toxicity were Gem 5, Vin 4.5, MetV 6.5, O 5.5 months and Gem 10, Vin 10, MetV 12, O 12 months respectively. Dose delays (Gem 41%, Vin 16.6%, MetV 13.8%, O 28.6%) and dose reductions (Gem 31.8%, Vin 33.3%, MetV 17.8%, O 28.6%) were less frequent with MetV.
Conclusions
We confirmed that up to 30% of newly diagnosed advanced EGFR/ALK negative and PD-L1 <50% NSCLC patients do not receive a first-line platinum doublet. Main clinical selection criteria were older age (>70years), comorbidities and low (≥2) PS. An oral treatment was frequently proposed with MetV being the preferred alternative chosen by clinicians due to the excellent safety profile.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
324P - COVID era: Perception of oncologists from a developing nation
Presenter: Rakesh Roy
Session: e-Poster Display Session
325P - Clinical characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients with COVID-19 infection: A retrospective study in a single center in the Philippines
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
326P - Management of diffuse large B cell lymphomas in the COVID-19 era
Presenter: David Ng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
327P - COVID-19 in patients with oncohematologic diseases in Kazakhstan
Presenter: Zaure Dushimova
Session: e-Poster Display Session
328P - Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on 30 days colorectal cancer patients mortality undergoing emergency operation
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
329P - Radiotherapy palliative and COVID-19: Experience of radiotherapy oncology department of Cancer Center Tlemcen, Algeria
Presenter: Asma Mous
Session: e-Poster Display Session
330P - COVID and cancer: Choosing between hammer and anvil
Presenter: Ullas Batra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
331P - The clock stopped with COVID-19 but continued ticking for cancer patients
Presenter: Sasi Shanmugam Senga
Session: e-Poster Display Session
336P - Efficacy of methylcobalamin administered intravenously for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN): A prospective crossover study
Presenter: Jun Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
337P - A prospective study about the quality of life and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
Presenter: Wala Ben Kridis
Session: e-Poster Display Session