Abstract 412P
Background
A significant proportion of newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients does not receive a first-line platinum doublet due to unfavorable clinical characteristics.
Methods
We retrospectively collected data on 221 EGFR/ALK negative and PD-L1 <50% patients [median age 79 (range 56-92) years, M/F 165(74.6%)/56(25.4%), PS 0/1/≥2 23(10.4%)/94(42.5%)/103(47.1%), adenoK/squamous/large-cell/NOS 107(48.4%)/94(42.5%)/9(4.1%)/11(5%), median of 2 serious comorbidities] with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC treated with a first-line single agent. Clinicians were asked about the criteria according to which treatment selection was made and what percentage of patients did not receive a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
Results
A median of 25% (range 10%-30%) of newly diagnosed NSCLC did not receive a first-line platinum combination. The main clinical criteria according to which decision was made were older age (76.5%), comorbidities (72%), low PS (55.2%) and familiar or social issues (10%). Single-agent treatment consisted of gemcitabine (Gem 10%), oral standard vinorelbine (Vin 8.2%), oral metronomic vinorelbine (MetV 78.6%) and other (O 3.2%). Median time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of single agent treatments were Gem 4.5, Vin 4.5, MetV 5, O 5 months and Gem 9, Vin 9, MetV 10, O 10.5 months respectively. Overall grade 3-4 toxicities were lower with MetV (8%) than with Gem (13.6%), Vin (16.6%) and O (14.3%). Median TTP and OS without grade 3-4 toxicity were Gem 5, Vin 4.5, MetV 6.5, O 5.5 months and Gem 10, Vin 10, MetV 12, O 12 months respectively. Dose delays (Gem 41%, Vin 16.6%, MetV 13.8%, O 28.6%) and dose reductions (Gem 31.8%, Vin 33.3%, MetV 17.8%, O 28.6%) were less frequent with MetV.
Conclusions
We confirmed that up to 30% of newly diagnosed advanced EGFR/ALK negative and PD-L1 <50% NSCLC patients do not receive a first-line platinum doublet. Main clinical selection criteria were older age (>70years), comorbidities and low (≥2) PS. An oral treatment was frequently proposed with MetV being the preferred alternative chosen by clinicians due to the excellent safety profile.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
434P - Pan-Canadian evidence-based, consensus-driven cancer treatment protocols/information for use at the point of care by medical oncologists? Is there a need?
Presenter: Kiran Virik
Session: e-Poster Display Session
435P - Hypnotics and risk of cancer: A meta-analysis of observational studies
Presenter: Tzu Rong Peng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
436P - Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of adolescent and young adult (AYA) melanoma: Results from an Asian perspective
Presenter: Wei Lin Goh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
437P - Long-term efficacy and toxicity outcome of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy for medullary thyroid cancer: A single institution cohort study
Presenter: Ka Man Cheung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
438P - Real-world data of relapse after adjuvant treatment (Tx) in high-risk melanoma
Presenter: Carolina Ortiz Velez
Session: e-Poster Display Session
439P - Immunohistochemical analysis of p53 and Ki-67 in glioblastoma (GBM) and their correlations with patient survival
Presenter: Paulo Luz
Session: e-Poster Display Session
440P - Blinded independent central review of oncology trials: The monitoring of readers' performance
Presenter: Hubert Beaumont
Session: e-Poster Display Session
441P - Influence of radiation therapy of patients with somatotropic pituitary adenomas depending on the age of patients
Presenter: Saodat Issaeva
Session: e-Poster Display Session
442P - Results from the registrational phase I/II ARROW trial of pralsetinib (BLU-667) in patients (pts) with advanced RET mutation-positive medullary thyroid cancer (RET+ MTC)
Presenter: Bhumsuk Keam
Session: e-Poster Display Session