Abstract 412P
Background
A significant proportion of newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients does not receive a first-line platinum doublet due to unfavorable clinical characteristics.
Methods
We retrospectively collected data on 221 EGFR/ALK negative and PD-L1 <50% patients [median age 79 (range 56-92) years, M/F 165(74.6%)/56(25.4%), PS 0/1/≥2 23(10.4%)/94(42.5%)/103(47.1%), adenoK/squamous/large-cell/NOS 107(48.4%)/94(42.5%)/9(4.1%)/11(5%), median of 2 serious comorbidities] with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC treated with a first-line single agent. Clinicians were asked about the criteria according to which treatment selection was made and what percentage of patients did not receive a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
Results
A median of 25% (range 10%-30%) of newly diagnosed NSCLC did not receive a first-line platinum combination. The main clinical criteria according to which decision was made were older age (76.5%), comorbidities (72%), low PS (55.2%) and familiar or social issues (10%). Single-agent treatment consisted of gemcitabine (Gem 10%), oral standard vinorelbine (Vin 8.2%), oral metronomic vinorelbine (MetV 78.6%) and other (O 3.2%). Median time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of single agent treatments were Gem 4.5, Vin 4.5, MetV 5, O 5 months and Gem 9, Vin 9, MetV 10, O 10.5 months respectively. Overall grade 3-4 toxicities were lower with MetV (8%) than with Gem (13.6%), Vin (16.6%) and O (14.3%). Median TTP and OS without grade 3-4 toxicity were Gem 5, Vin 4.5, MetV 6.5, O 5.5 months and Gem 10, Vin 10, MetV 12, O 12 months respectively. Dose delays (Gem 41%, Vin 16.6%, MetV 13.8%, O 28.6%) and dose reductions (Gem 31.8%, Vin 33.3%, MetV 17.8%, O 28.6%) were less frequent with MetV.
Conclusions
We confirmed that up to 30% of newly diagnosed advanced EGFR/ALK negative and PD-L1 <50% NSCLC patients do not receive a first-line platinum doublet. Main clinical selection criteria were older age (>70years), comorbidities and low (≥2) PS. An oral treatment was frequently proposed with MetV being the preferred alternative chosen by clinicians due to the excellent safety profile.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
312P - Identification of neoantigen-specific T cell response and anti-tumour immunity in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Xiaoxiao Du
Session: e-Poster Display Session
313P - Diagnostic value of micro RNA (miRNA) in renal cell cancer: A meta-analysis and systemic review
Presenter: Jestoni Aranilla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
314P - Comprehensive microbial signatures and genomic profiling in tumour samples using next generation sequencing
Presenter: Mei Qi Yee
Session: e-Poster Display Session
315P - High-penetrance breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in Filipinos
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
316P - Implementation of Vela Analytics to accelerate comprehensive interpretation and reporting of next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing in clinical diagnostic laboratories
Presenter: Yingnan Yu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
317P - Genomic profiling and molecular pathology of Chinese glioma patients
Presenter: yuanli Zhao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
320P - Psychometric interplay of the perception of the real-life impact of COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of patients with newly diagnosed malignancies
Presenter: Kelvin Bao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
321P - Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on adherence to treatment schedule among cancer patients
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
322P - Challenged faced by cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
Presenter: mithra Krishnamani
Session: e-Poster Display Session
323P - Oncology care in the Republic of Kazakhstan during COVID-19
Presenter: Dilyara Kaidarova
Session: e-Poster Display Session