Abstract 412P
Background
A significant proportion of newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients does not receive a first-line platinum doublet due to unfavorable clinical characteristics.
Methods
We retrospectively collected data on 221 EGFR/ALK negative and PD-L1 <50% patients [median age 79 (range 56-92) years, M/F 165(74.6%)/56(25.4%), PS 0/1/≥2 23(10.4%)/94(42.5%)/103(47.1%), adenoK/squamous/large-cell/NOS 107(48.4%)/94(42.5%)/9(4.1%)/11(5%), median of 2 serious comorbidities] with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC treated with a first-line single agent. Clinicians were asked about the criteria according to which treatment selection was made and what percentage of patients did not receive a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
Results
A median of 25% (range 10%-30%) of newly diagnosed NSCLC did not receive a first-line platinum combination. The main clinical criteria according to which decision was made were older age (76.5%), comorbidities (72%), low PS (55.2%) and familiar or social issues (10%). Single-agent treatment consisted of gemcitabine (Gem 10%), oral standard vinorelbine (Vin 8.2%), oral metronomic vinorelbine (MetV 78.6%) and other (O 3.2%). Median time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of single agent treatments were Gem 4.5, Vin 4.5, MetV 5, O 5 months and Gem 9, Vin 9, MetV 10, O 10.5 months respectively. Overall grade 3-4 toxicities were lower with MetV (8%) than with Gem (13.6%), Vin (16.6%) and O (14.3%). Median TTP and OS without grade 3-4 toxicity were Gem 5, Vin 4.5, MetV 6.5, O 5.5 months and Gem 10, Vin 10, MetV 12, O 12 months respectively. Dose delays (Gem 41%, Vin 16.6%, MetV 13.8%, O 28.6%) and dose reductions (Gem 31.8%, Vin 33.3%, MetV 17.8%, O 28.6%) were less frequent with MetV.
Conclusions
We confirmed that up to 30% of newly diagnosed advanced EGFR/ALK negative and PD-L1 <50% NSCLC patients do not receive a first-line platinum doublet. Main clinical selection criteria were older age (>70years), comorbidities and low (≥2) PS. An oral treatment was frequently proposed with MetV being the preferred alternative chosen by clinicians due to the excellent safety profile.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
210P - Prognostic value of sarcopenia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review
Presenter: Angeline Tancherla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
211P - The impact of low muscle mass to overall survival in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Karunia Japar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
213P - Stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Predictors of relapse and outcomes for adjuvant carboplatin vs active surveillance
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
214P - Study of treatment outcome in adults with TFE related RCC
Presenter: Ajaykumar Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
215P - Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of responses in metastatic sites with nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: e-Poster Display Session
216P - Clinical profile and treatment outcome of testicular seminoma treated at tertiary care centre in Chennai
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
220P - A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Winnie Sung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
221P - Patient-reported sexual and urinary function in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) when treated with apalutamide (APA) vs placebo (PBO) and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in SPARTAN
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
222P - Tolerability and treatment response to darolutamide (DARO) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the phase III ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Matthew R. Smith
Session: e-Poster Display Session