Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

e-Poster Display Session

212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes

Date

22 Nov 2020

Session

e-Poster Display Session

Topics

Tumour Site

Malignant Germ-Cell Tumours of the Adult Male

Presenters

Gaik Tin Quah

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_6): S1319-S1324. 10.1016/annonc/annonc357

Authors

G.T. Quah1, D. Espinoza2, M. Arasaratnam1, M. Crumbaker3, B. Balakrishnar4, A. Brooks5, H. Lau5, M. Patel5, S. Bariol5, H. Gurney1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, 2145 - Westmead/AU
  • 2 Nhmrc Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, 2006 - Sydney/AU
  • 3 Medical Oncology Dept, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, 2010 - Sydney/AU
  • 4 Medical Oncology, Sydney Southwest Local Health District - Liverpool Hospital, 2170 - Liverpool/AU
  • 5 Urology, The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, 2145 - Westmead/AU

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 212P

Background

Treatment options for stage 1 (CS1) non-seminoma testicular cancer (NSGCT) following surgery include active surveillance (AS) or adjuvant bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP). Presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and embryonal carcinoma (EC) have been associated with an increased risk of relapse.(1)

Methods

Data on CS1 testicular cancer patients presenting to two sites in Western Sydney between 1990 and 2019 were analysed. Tumour characteristics including tumour markers, size of primary, LVI, rete testis involvement (RTI) and histology were correlated with relapse.

Results

A total of 168 cases of CS1 NSGCT were identified. None of the 20 patients who received 2 cycles of adjuvant BEP relapsed, compared to 47 of 148 (32%) on AS. All relapsed patients received BEP and 19 (40%) had post-chemotherapy surgery. 14 out of 19 resection samples showed residual teratoma, and the remaining showed necrotic tumour. There were 2 deaths from relapse, and 1 from other causes. RFS at 5 years was 71% and OS 97%. In AS patients, LVI and RTI were predictors of relapse with HR of 8.50 (95% CI 4.12, 17.54, p=<.0001)) and 3.12 (95% CI 1.46, 6.70, p=0.01). 29 of 44 pts (66%) with LVI relapsed compared to 10 of 85 (12%) without LVI. EC was not associated with relapse. (HR 1.80; CI 0.71, 4.57, p=0.2).

Conclusions

In our series, relapse rate of 32% in AS group is in keeping with published data from a large population-cohort study.(1) LVI was associated with an almost 9-fold increase in risk of recurrence, also consistent with previous findings. Of those, 40% required post-chemotherapy surgery. Although long term outcomes remain good, treatments for relapse are associated with increased morbidity. Therefore, we recommend CS1 NSGCT patients with LVI be considered for a single cycle of BEP rather than AS to reduce risk of relapse and prevent relapse related treatment morbidity.(2) References: 1. Daugaard G, Gundgaard MG, Mortensen MS, Agerbaek M, Holm NV, Rorth M, et al. Surveillance for stage I nonseminoma testicular cancer: outcomes and long-term follow-up in a population-based cohort. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(34):3817-23. 2. Cullen M, Huddart R, Joffe J, Gardiner D, Maynard L, Hutton P, et al. The 111 Study: A Single-arm, Phase 3 Trial Evaluating One Cycle of Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cisplatin as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-risk, Stage 1 Nonseminomatous or Combined Germ Cell Tumours of the Testis. Eur Urol. 2020;77(3):344-51.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

M. Arasaratnam: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses, educational meeting 2019: Pfizer. H. Gurney: Advisory/Consultancy, Advisory board: BMS; Advisory/Consultancy, Advisory board: Astellas; Advisory/Consultancy, Advisory board: Pfizer; Advisory/Consultancy, Advisory board: MSD; Advisory/Consultancy, Advisory board: Merck; Advisory/Consultancy, Advisory board: Ipsen; Advisory/Consultancy, Advisory board: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.