Abstract 438P
Background
Adjuvant (adj) Tx with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors or targeted therapy (TT) for 1 year in patients (pts) with high-risk resected melanoma prolongs relapse-free survival (RFS). However, up to 1/3 of pts recur in the year after adj Tx and there are few data regarding patterns of relapse, management and outcomes. Our aim was to describe how adj Tx impacts the outcomes in melanoma pts in our center.
Methods
Single-institution experience of 123 consecutive pts with melanoma resected in our center from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathological factors, adj Tx, timing and patterns of relapse, Tx at relapse and subsequent outcomes were examined.
Results
Median age at diagnosis was 57 years, 45% were male and BRAF-mt was found in 38%. Stage III A/B/C/D or IV was 6%, 10%, 19%, 1% and 1%, respectively. Sentinel node biopsy was performed in 80% and lymphadenectomy in 33% of 123 pts. A total of 49 pts received adj Tx: 3 pts (6%) TT, 8 pts (16%) IFN-α, and 38 pts (31%) immunotherapy (iTx) with anti-PD-1 and/or ipilimumab. A total of 40 pts (32%) had relapse (65% locoregional and 35% distant), 8 pts (21%) had prior adj iTx with a median RFS of 21.5 months (m) (CI95%17.4-NA). 24 pts (60%) were resected (6 pts with distant recurrent), 14 pts received adj Tx (12 pts iTx, 1 pt IFN-α and 1 pt TT), for 4-pts was the second adj Tx. A total of 31 of 123 pts (25%) developed metastatic melanoma (MM), of these 17 pts (55%) received adj Tx. PFS at 1st line of Tx of pts with prior adj-Tx vs no was similar (HR=1.01, p=0.98), mainly Tx were iTx (65%), TT (31%) and chemotherapy (4%). Remarkably, there was no worse response rate (complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) in pts with prior adj Tx (68.8% vs 35.7%, p=0.14). Of 17 pts with prior adj-Tx (16 pts adj-iTx) who had MM, twelve (70.6%) received iTx at 1st line, 50% had response to iTx. Also, all 4 pts BRAF-mt with prior adj iTx who received TT at 1st line had CR or PR. There was no correlation between treatment-free interval after adj TX and PFS at 1st line (p=0.66).
Conclusions
Our real-world data demonstrates that after a locoregional or distant relapse of melanoma, despite prior adj-Tx, Tx with iTx or TT can be active. But additional research is needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R. Dienstmann: Advisory/Consultancy: Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self): Roche, Ipsen, Amgen, Servier, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dohme; Research grant/Funding (self): Merck, Pierre Fabre. E. Muñoz-Couselo: Advisory/Consultancy: BMS; Advisory/Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory/Consultancy: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
210P - Prognostic value of sarcopenia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review
Presenter: Angeline Tancherla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
211P - The impact of low muscle mass to overall survival in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Karunia Japar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
213P - Stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Predictors of relapse and outcomes for adjuvant carboplatin vs active surveillance
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
214P - Study of treatment outcome in adults with TFE related RCC
Presenter: Ajaykumar Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
215P - Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of responses in metastatic sites with nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: e-Poster Display Session
216P - Clinical profile and treatment outcome of testicular seminoma treated at tertiary care centre in Chennai
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
220P - A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Winnie Sung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
221P - Patient-reported sexual and urinary function in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) when treated with apalutamide (APA) vs placebo (PBO) and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in SPARTAN
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
222P - Tolerability and treatment response to darolutamide (DARO) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the phase III ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Matthew R. Smith
Session: e-Poster Display Session