Abstract 438P
Background
Adjuvant (adj) Tx with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors or targeted therapy (TT) for 1 year in patients (pts) with high-risk resected melanoma prolongs relapse-free survival (RFS). However, up to 1/3 of pts recur in the year after adj Tx and there are few data regarding patterns of relapse, management and outcomes. Our aim was to describe how adj Tx impacts the outcomes in melanoma pts in our center.
Methods
Single-institution experience of 123 consecutive pts with melanoma resected in our center from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathological factors, adj Tx, timing and patterns of relapse, Tx at relapse and subsequent outcomes were examined.
Results
Median age at diagnosis was 57 years, 45% were male and BRAF-mt was found in 38%. Stage III A/B/C/D or IV was 6%, 10%, 19%, 1% and 1%, respectively. Sentinel node biopsy was performed in 80% and lymphadenectomy in 33% of 123 pts. A total of 49 pts received adj Tx: 3 pts (6%) TT, 8 pts (16%) IFN-α, and 38 pts (31%) immunotherapy (iTx) with anti-PD-1 and/or ipilimumab. A total of 40 pts (32%) had relapse (65% locoregional and 35% distant), 8 pts (21%) had prior adj iTx with a median RFS of 21.5 months (m) (CI95%17.4-NA). 24 pts (60%) were resected (6 pts with distant recurrent), 14 pts received adj Tx (12 pts iTx, 1 pt IFN-α and 1 pt TT), for 4-pts was the second adj Tx. A total of 31 of 123 pts (25%) developed metastatic melanoma (MM), of these 17 pts (55%) received adj Tx. PFS at 1st line of Tx of pts with prior adj-Tx vs no was similar (HR=1.01, p=0.98), mainly Tx were iTx (65%), TT (31%) and chemotherapy (4%). Remarkably, there was no worse response rate (complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) in pts with prior adj Tx (68.8% vs 35.7%, p=0.14). Of 17 pts with prior adj-Tx (16 pts adj-iTx) who had MM, twelve (70.6%) received iTx at 1st line, 50% had response to iTx. Also, all 4 pts BRAF-mt with prior adj iTx who received TT at 1st line had CR or PR. There was no correlation between treatment-free interval after adj TX and PFS at 1st line (p=0.66).
Conclusions
Our real-world data demonstrates that after a locoregional or distant relapse of melanoma, despite prior adj-Tx, Tx with iTx or TT can be active. But additional research is needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R. Dienstmann: Advisory/Consultancy: Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self): Roche, Ipsen, Amgen, Servier, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dohme; Research grant/Funding (self): Merck, Pierre Fabre. E. Muñoz-Couselo: Advisory/Consultancy: BMS; Advisory/Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory/Consultancy: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
183P - Textbook outcome as a measure of surgical quality assessment and prognosis in gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: A large multicenter sample analysis
Presenter: You-Xin Gao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
184P - Development and external validation of a nomogram to predict recurrence-free survival after R0 resection for stage II/III gastric adenocarcinoma: An international multicenter study
Presenter: Bin-Bin Xu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
185P - Effect of sarcopenia on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with gastric neuroendocrine tumour after radical surgery: Results from a large, two-institutional series
Presenter: Ling-Qian Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
186P - Characterization of the gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumour patient journey
Presenter: George Fisher Jr
Session: e-Poster Display Session
187P - More is not always better: A multicenter study in lymphadenectomy during gastrectomy for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma
Presenter: Qi-Yue Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
188P - The impact of sarcopenia on chemotherapy toxicity and survival rate among pancreatic cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Billy Susanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
189P - Prognostic value of inflammation-based score for patients treated with FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP)
Presenter: Takahiro Yamamura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
190P - Outcomes from the Asian region of the phase III APACT trial of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/G) vs gemcitabine (G) alone for patients (pts) with resected pancreatic cancer (PC)
Presenter: Joon Oh Park
Session: e-Poster Display Session
191P - First-line liposomal irinotecan + 5 fluorouracil/leucovorin + oxaliplatin in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results from a phase I/II study
Presenter: Andrew Dean
Session: e-Poster Display Session
192P - A multicenter crossover analysis of first and second-line FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel administered to pancreatic cancer patients: Results from the NAPOLEON study
Presenter: Kenta Nio
Session: e-Poster Display Session