Abstract 434P
Background
A number of provincial online treatment guidelines/protocols exist in Canada, which differ in the information contained and the ease of use. Currently there is no national evidence-based, consensus-driven cancer treatment protocol for use at the point of care. The aim of such a resource would be to support Medical Oncologists (MOs) in the delivery of cancer treatment at the clinic interface and potentially improve patient outcomes by reducing treatment variation across Canada.
Methods
The study was conducted in two stages. Available provincial cancer treatment protocols were evaluated with regards to: content for chemotherapy, immunotherapy, ease of use, toxicity, dosing recommendations, reference studies. Canadian MOs were invited to participate in an anonymous survey distributed through the Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists. The assessment included: current online resources (OR) used, information provided, ease of use, relevance to point of care use, need for a national Canadian resource. MOs were asked to review a comparator Pan-Australian OR.
Results
40/327 responded: 28% BC, 26% ON and the rest from other provinces. 82%, 54% and 23% respectively used the BC and ON and other provincial ORs. 50% used ≥2 websites. 62% found the website of choice easy to use, 33% felt it had updated immune therapy information and 26% felt it was updated regularly. The OR used met the MO need for dose/scheduling in 87.5% cases but only 50% and 37.5% cases for AEs and reference information respectively. Criteria evaluated in the ORs included: dosing, toxicity modification, AEs, monitoring, references and other criteria. 95% of MOs felt that a single portal aimed at point of care for Canadian MOs would be of value. 64% felt that the international comparator was better than the current OR being used.
Conclusions
There is variation in the current Canadian OR used by MOs in Canada with a need for national evidence-based, cancer treatment protocols/information for use at the point of care. To develop such a Pan-Canadian website resource, further analysis and infrastructure is required. Such a resource would potentially reduce treatment variability and augment quality of care delivered.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
210P - Prognostic value of sarcopenia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review
Presenter: Angeline Tancherla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
211P - The impact of low muscle mass to overall survival in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Karunia Japar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
213P - Stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Predictors of relapse and outcomes for adjuvant carboplatin vs active surveillance
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
214P - Study of treatment outcome in adults with TFE related RCC
Presenter: Ajaykumar Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
215P - Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of responses in metastatic sites with nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: e-Poster Display Session
216P - Clinical profile and treatment outcome of testicular seminoma treated at tertiary care centre in Chennai
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
220P - A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Winnie Sung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
221P - Patient-reported sexual and urinary function in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) when treated with apalutamide (APA) vs placebo (PBO) and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in SPARTAN
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
222P - Tolerability and treatment response to darolutamide (DARO) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the phase III ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Matthew R. Smith
Session: e-Poster Display Session