Abstract 434P
Background
A number of provincial online treatment guidelines/protocols exist in Canada, which differ in the information contained and the ease of use. Currently there is no national evidence-based, consensus-driven cancer treatment protocol for use at the point of care. The aim of such a resource would be to support Medical Oncologists (MOs) in the delivery of cancer treatment at the clinic interface and potentially improve patient outcomes by reducing treatment variation across Canada.
Methods
The study was conducted in two stages. Available provincial cancer treatment protocols were evaluated with regards to: content for chemotherapy, immunotherapy, ease of use, toxicity, dosing recommendations, reference studies. Canadian MOs were invited to participate in an anonymous survey distributed through the Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists. The assessment included: current online resources (OR) used, information provided, ease of use, relevance to point of care use, need for a national Canadian resource. MOs were asked to review a comparator Pan-Australian OR.
Results
40/327 responded: 28% BC, 26% ON and the rest from other provinces. 82%, 54% and 23% respectively used the BC and ON and other provincial ORs. 50% used ≥2 websites. 62% found the website of choice easy to use, 33% felt it had updated immune therapy information and 26% felt it was updated regularly. The OR used met the MO need for dose/scheduling in 87.5% cases but only 50% and 37.5% cases for AEs and reference information respectively. Criteria evaluated in the ORs included: dosing, toxicity modification, AEs, monitoring, references and other criteria. 95% of MOs felt that a single portal aimed at point of care for Canadian MOs would be of value. 64% felt that the international comparator was better than the current OR being used.
Conclusions
There is variation in the current Canadian OR used by MOs in Canada with a need for national evidence-based, cancer treatment protocols/information for use at the point of care. To develop such a Pan-Canadian website resource, further analysis and infrastructure is required. Such a resource would potentially reduce treatment variability and augment quality of care delivered.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
223P - Overall survival (OS) results of phase III ARAMIS study of darolutamide (DARO) added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)
Presenter: Karim Fizazi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
224P - Associations of pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) with treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer: A real-world, population-based study
Presenter: Atul Batra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
225P - Prostate cancer treatments and outcomes in the elderly: A retrospective analysis of an Australian real-world cohort
Presenter: Michael Fernando
Session: e-Poster Display Session
226P - Use of PSMA PET in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Andrew Jensen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
227P - Phase II study of pembrolizumab (pembro) plus enzalutamide for enzalutamide (enza)-resistant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Cohorts (C) 4 and 5 update from KEYNOTE-199
Presenter: Ulka Vaishampayan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
228P - Symptoms and impacts of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) among Japanese patients designated to receive Ra-223
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
229P - Expanding the role of supervised exercise on fatigue in prostate cancer patient receiving androgen deprivation therapy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
Presenter: Niwanda Yogiswara
Session: e-Poster Display Session
230P - Molecular profiling and clinical characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer
Presenter: Ranlu Liu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
231P - Phase II study of pembrolizumab in docetaxel-pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Updated follow-up of cohorts (C) 1-3 from KEYNOTE-199
Presenter: Jeffrey Goh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
232P - Real-world data on metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide: A regional experience
Presenter: Rachel Raju
Session: e-Poster Display Session