Abstract 159P
Background
The impact of time on the efficacy of advanced distal gastric cancer (ADGC) remains unclear. At 3 years postoperatively, the efficacy of oncologic surgery for ADGC needs to be confirmed.
Methods
A total of 1256 patients with ADGC at two teaching institutions in China from April 2007 to December 2014 were enrolled. The general data of the two groups were matched using propensity scores. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to compare survival.
Results
After matching, 461 patients each in the open distal gastrectomy (ODG) and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) groups were analyzed. The 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival in ODG group were comparable to those in LDG group. RMST-stratified analysis showed that the 3-year RMST of ODG group was similar to that of LDG group (-1.38 years, P=0.163) in cT4a patients, whereas the 5-year RMST had significant differences between groups (-8.36 years, P=0.005). In further stratified analysis, when patients with cT4a and tumor was >5 cm, the 3-year RMST of ODG group was similar to that of LDG group (0.98 year, P=0.480); however, the 5-year RMST was significantly longer in ODG group (4.67 years, P=0.042). Multivariate regression analysis showed that ODG is a protective factor for 5-year OS in patients with cT4a and tumors >5 cm.
Conclusions
Beyond 3 years, ODG can improve the survival of patients with serous infiltration and tumors >5 cm by reducing the risk of recurrence. The present findings can serve as a reference for the preoperative selection of GC surgery options and the setting of follow-up time for clinical studies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
104P - Safety and efficacy of HLX04 versus reference bevacizumab in combination with XELOX or mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomised, double-blind phase III study
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
105P - Prospective, open-label, observational study of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC): The OPTIM1SE study
Presenter: Tsai-Sheng Yang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
106P - Efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine and mitomycin-C based concurrent radiotherapy in patients with anal canal cancer
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: e-Poster Display Session
107P - Safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from the Australian cohort of the phase IIIb, international, open-label, early-access PRECONNECT study
Presenter: Timothy Price
Session: e-Poster Display Session
108P - Comparative analysis of two-stage hepatectomy and enhanced one-stage hepatectomy in the setting of bilobar colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Hayk Torgomyan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
109P - Efficacy and safety of biweekly or triweekly XELOX regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer
Presenter: hangyu zhang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
110P - Analysis for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) effect for colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Wei Zou
Session: e-Poster Display Session
111P - A meta-analysis study on safety and effectiveness comparison between FOLFOX and XELOX regiments on advanced stage colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
112P - Pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Asia subgroup results of the phase III KEYNOTE-177 study
Presenter: Takayuki Yoshino
Session: e-Poster Display Session
122P - Nomogram to predict short-term effect of radiotherapy based on pre/post-treatment inflammatory biomarkers and their dynamic changes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Shuai Liang
Session: e-Poster Display Session