Abstract 78P
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and CAR-T cell immunotherapies have provided new treatment options for many patients with metastatic disease and hematological malignancy, respectively, inducing durable responses in some cases. CAR-T is not indicated for solid tumors and ICI responsiveness requires high tumor mutational load, CD8+ T cell infiltration and positive IFN-γ status, defining an inflamed phenotype (“hot tumors”). However, the majority of metastatic tumors present as non-inflamed (“cold tumors”), thus limiting the applicability of ICI to a minority subset of patients with highly immunogenic tumors. Immunological treatment of cold tumors is a great challenge as no pre-existing adaptive immune response has been established or maintained.
Methods
AlloStim®, was used on compassionate grounds AlloStim® is currently being evaluated in a phase IIB clinical trial in USA in MSI-S, chemotherapy-refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer patients, an indication known to present with “cold” lesions and to be non-responsive to ICI. AlloStim® is a living, non-genetically manipulated, allogeneic Th1-like cell therapy derived from precursor cells purified, expanded and differentiated from blood of normal donors. The AlloStim® mechanism of action is purported to convert “cold” tumors to “hot” tumors and naturally down-regulate checkpoint molecules in the tumor microenvironment. Single dose vials of formulated AlloStim® cells were delivered to our center in liquid nitrogen dry shippers. Administered either intradermally (ID) or intravenously (IV). The protocol included 3 weekly intradermal (ID) injections followed a week later by an intravenous (IV) infusion. This 4-week cycle was repeated 3 times. Upon approval of our institutional review board and obtaining informed consent.
Results
7 patients were acured 3 advanced/metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma, 2 breast cancer, 1 gall bladder and 1 Nasopharyngeal cancer. Due to the advanced status and poor ECOG status, only 3 completed the treatment schedule. 2 were still stable and alive at 1-year follow-up without receiving any other systemic therapy.
Conclusions
Simple to administer, minimal side-effects and appears to have activity in refractory metastatic disease. Further controlled clinical trials is warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Kananathan.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Har Noy: Leadership role, Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Officer/Board of Directors: Mirror Biologics Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
211P - The impact of low muscle mass to overall survival in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Karunia Japar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
213P - Stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Predictors of relapse and outcomes for adjuvant carboplatin vs active surveillance
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
214P - Study of treatment outcome in adults with TFE related RCC
Presenter: Ajaykumar Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
215P - Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of responses in metastatic sites with nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: e-Poster Display Session
216P - Clinical profile and treatment outcome of testicular seminoma treated at tertiary care centre in Chennai
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
220P - A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Winnie Sung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
221P - Patient-reported sexual and urinary function in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) when treated with apalutamide (APA) vs placebo (PBO) and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in SPARTAN
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
222P - Tolerability and treatment response to darolutamide (DARO) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the phase III ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Matthew R. Smith
Session: e-Poster Display Session
223P - Overall survival (OS) results of phase III ARAMIS study of darolutamide (DARO) added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)
Presenter: Karim Fizazi
Session: e-Poster Display Session