Abstract 78P
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and CAR-T cell immunotherapies have provided new treatment options for many patients with metastatic disease and hematological malignancy, respectively, inducing durable responses in some cases. CAR-T is not indicated for solid tumors and ICI responsiveness requires high tumor mutational load, CD8+ T cell infiltration and positive IFN-γ status, defining an inflamed phenotype (“hot tumors”). However, the majority of metastatic tumors present as non-inflamed (“cold tumors”), thus limiting the applicability of ICI to a minority subset of patients with highly immunogenic tumors. Immunological treatment of cold tumors is a great challenge as no pre-existing adaptive immune response has been established or maintained.
Methods
AlloStim®, was used on compassionate grounds AlloStim® is currently being evaluated in a phase IIB clinical trial in USA in MSI-S, chemotherapy-refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer patients, an indication known to present with “cold” lesions and to be non-responsive to ICI. AlloStim® is a living, non-genetically manipulated, allogeneic Th1-like cell therapy derived from precursor cells purified, expanded and differentiated from blood of normal donors. The AlloStim® mechanism of action is purported to convert “cold” tumors to “hot” tumors and naturally down-regulate checkpoint molecules in the tumor microenvironment. Single dose vials of formulated AlloStim® cells were delivered to our center in liquid nitrogen dry shippers. Administered either intradermally (ID) or intravenously (IV). The protocol included 3 weekly intradermal (ID) injections followed a week later by an intravenous (IV) infusion. This 4-week cycle was repeated 3 times. Upon approval of our institutional review board and obtaining informed consent.
Results
7 patients were acured 3 advanced/metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma, 2 breast cancer, 1 gall bladder and 1 Nasopharyngeal cancer. Due to the advanced status and poor ECOG status, only 3 completed the treatment schedule. 2 were still stable and alive at 1-year follow-up without receiving any other systemic therapy.
Conclusions
Simple to administer, minimal side-effects and appears to have activity in refractory metastatic disease. Further controlled clinical trials is warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Kananathan.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Har Noy: Leadership role, Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Officer/Board of Directors: Mirror Biologics Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
164P - The impact of sarcopenia on chemotherapy toxicity and survival rate among hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Elizabeth Marcella
Session: e-Poster Display Session
165P - Prognostic factors in sorafenib-treated hepatocellular carcinoma: Multicentre analysis of a European population sample
Presenter: João Gramaça
Session: e-Poster Display Session
166P - Differences and similarities in presentation and management patterns in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) across Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand
Presenter: Pierce Chow
Session: e-Poster Display Session
167P - Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in tertiary level hospitals in Bangladesh
Presenter: Abdullah Al Mamun Khan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
168P - Response assessments in hepatocellular carcinoma: What are the best criteria to utilize? mRECIST or RECIST 1.1? A retrospective meta-analysis of multiple phase III trials
Presenter: Oliver Bohnsack
Session: e-Poster Display Session
169P - IMbrave150: Management of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) for atezolizumab (atezo) and bevacizumab (bev) in unresectable HCC
Presenter: Masatoshi Kudo
Session: e-Poster Display Session
170P - Sintilimab plus anlotinib as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Xiaofeng Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
171P - Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib versus TACE plus sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT): A prospective randomized study
Presenter: Xiaoyan Ding
Session: e-Poster Display Session
172P - Triple combination therapy of lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Zhi-Cheng Lai
Session: e-Poster Display Session
173P - Regorafenib in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in real-world practice in Asia: Interim results from the observational REFINE study
Presenter: Ho Yeong Lim
Session: e-Poster Display Session