Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

e-Poster Display Session

165P - Prognostic factors in sorafenib-treated hepatocellular carcinoma: Multicentre analysis of a European population sample

Date

22 Nov 2020

Session

e-Poster Display Session

Topics

Tumour Site

Hepatobiliary Cancers

Presenters

João Gramaça

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_6): S1287-S1318. 10.1016/annonc/annonc356

Authors

J. Gramaça1, J. Liz Pimenta2, G. Nogueira Da Costa1, S.A. Duarte2, P.C. Liu2, I.C. Gomes Fernandes1, R. Gameiro Dos Santos1, C.F.P. Trabulo1, E. Cadavez2, R.M. Gomes2, M. Castelo Branco2, A. Lojo Teira2, T. Malheiro Sarmento2, A. Baptista1, I.M. Matos Pina1, M. Sousa2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro Montijo, 2834-003 - Barreiro/PT
  • 2 Medical Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-508 - Vila Real/PT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 165P

Background

Sorafenib has been the standard-of-care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Prognostic factors such as BCLC stage and macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), together with predictive factors of response such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), cirrhosis etiology and extrahepatic spread (EHS) were found to be associated to survival outcomes. Nevertheless, these factors need to be fully validated. We intend to explore and identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in a European population sample treated with sorafenib.

Methods

Multicentre retrospective evaluation of patients’ (pts) charts of HCC pts with ECOG performance status (PS) ≤2 treated with sorafenib between 2008 and 2019 in two Portuguese centres. Alfa- fetoprotein (AFP) < 200 ng/mL, EHS, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Na (MELD-Na) < 17, cutaneous toxicity, NLR < 2.3, MVI and previous locoregional treatment (LRT) were considered for stratification. Each factor was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method for OS estimation and a multivariate Cox regression was performed.

Results

Eighty-six pts were analyzed, 15% female and with a median age (med) of 65.5 years [36-83]. Considering underlying cause, 45% pts had alcohol-related liver disease, 23% hepatitis C virus, 14% hepatitis B virus and 5% non-alcoholic steatosis hepatitis. Median OS was 8.5 months (m). Kaplan-Meier analysis of OS proved to be statistical significant in the following factors: AFP < 200 ng/mL med OS 12.5 m and ≥ 200 ng/mL 5.4 m (p < 0.0001); MELD-Na < 17 med OS 10.4 m and ≥ 17 4.8 m (p=0.015); absence of EHS med OS 10.0 m and presence of EHS med OS 7.3 m (p=0.028); previous LRT med OS 11.2 m and no LRT med OS 6.6 m (p=0.005). Multivariate Cox analysis identified extra-hepatic involvement (HR 1.002, p=0.041) and no previous LRT (HR 1.871, p=0.009) as risk factors.

Conclusions

HCC pts represent a heterogeneous population with many factors that potentially affect prognosis, such as geographic etiology difference in hepatic cirrhosis. In our sample, analysis of single-variable subgroups estimated greater OS in pts with AFP < 200 ng/mL, MELD-Na < 17, absence of EHS and previous LRT. The multivariate regression showed EHS and no previous LRT are independent factors for worse prognosis.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.