Abstract 8P
Background
Fertility and pregnancy-related issues are a priority area of concern for young breast cancer (BC) patients (pts). Limited evidence exists on knowledge, practice and attitudes of physicians practicingin low- and middle-income countries (LMIC)towards these issues.
Methods
A 19-item questionnaire adapted from an international survey (Lambertini et al, Breast 2018) exploring issuesaboutfertility preservation and pregnancy after BCwas sent by email to physicians from LMIC involved in BC care.Descriptive analyses were performed.
Results
A total of 288 physicians completed the survey. Median age was 38 years (interquartile range 33-45).Respondents from Asia, Africa, America and Europe filled in the survey: the 3 most represented countries were Mexico (27.1%), India (18.4%) and Brazil (8.3%).The majority of respondents were medical oncologists (44.4%)working in an academic setting (46.9%). Among respondents, 40.2% and 53.8% reported never having consulted the available international guidelines on fertility preservation and pregnancy after BC, respectively. 25.0%, 19.1% and 24.3% of respondents declared to be not at all knowledgeable about embryo, oocyte or ovarian tissue cryopreservation, respectively. 29.2%, 23.6% and 31.3% declared that embryo, oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation are not available in their countries, respectively. 57.6% of respondents disagreed or were neutral on the statement that controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) can be considered safe in BC pts; 29.9%suggested that COS should not be considered safe in pts with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease. 49.7% and 58.6% of respondents agreed or were neutral on the statement that pregnancy in BC survivors may increase the risk of recurrence overall or only in those with HR+ disease, respectively. In contrast, 49.0% agreed that COS in BC survivors can be safely considered.
Conclusions
Several misconceptions exist among physicians from LMIC on fertility and pregnancy-related issues in young BC pts. Increased awareness and further educational initiatives are needed to improve adherence to available guidelines and pts’oncofertility counseling.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
N.F. Ponde: Advisory/Consultancy: Lilly; Honoraria (self): Roche,Novartis, AstraZeneca and Lilly. M. Brandão: Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche/GNE. I.B. Spasojevic: Advisory/Consultancy: Roche, Novartis, Amicus; Honoraria (self): Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca. A. Odhiambo: Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis; Advisory/Consultancy: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Janssen. M. Tagliamento: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Takeda; Full/Part-time employment, Medical Writer: Novartis, Amgen. M. Lambertini: Advisory/Consultancy: Roche, Novartis; Honoraria (self): Roche, Takeda, Theramex, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
105P - Prospective, open-label, observational study of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC): The OPTIM1SE study
Presenter: Tsai-Sheng Yang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
106P - Efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine and mitomycin-C based concurrent radiotherapy in patients with anal canal cancer
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: e-Poster Display Session
107P - Safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from the Australian cohort of the phase IIIb, international, open-label, early-access PRECONNECT study
Presenter: Timothy Price
Session: e-Poster Display Session
108P - Comparative analysis of two-stage hepatectomy and enhanced one-stage hepatectomy in the setting of bilobar colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Hayk Torgomyan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
109P - Efficacy and safety of biweekly or triweekly XELOX regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer
Presenter: hangyu zhang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
110P - Analysis for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) effect for colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Wei Zou
Session: e-Poster Display Session
111P - A meta-analysis study on safety and effectiveness comparison between FOLFOX and XELOX regiments on advanced stage colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
112P - Pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Asia subgroup results of the phase III KEYNOTE-177 study
Presenter: Takayuki Yoshino
Session: e-Poster Display Session
122P - Nomogram to predict short-term effect of radiotherapy based on pre/post-treatment inflammatory biomarkers and their dynamic changes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Shuai Liang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
123P - The clinical value of prognostic nutritional index in esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma patients with anastomotic leakage after surgery
Presenter: Yan Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session