Abstract 8P
Background
Fertility and pregnancy-related issues are a priority area of concern for young breast cancer (BC) patients (pts). Limited evidence exists on knowledge, practice and attitudes of physicians practicingin low- and middle-income countries (LMIC)towards these issues.
Methods
A 19-item questionnaire adapted from an international survey (Lambertini et al, Breast 2018) exploring issuesaboutfertility preservation and pregnancy after BCwas sent by email to physicians from LMIC involved in BC care.Descriptive analyses were performed.
Results
A total of 288 physicians completed the survey. Median age was 38 years (interquartile range 33-45).Respondents from Asia, Africa, America and Europe filled in the survey: the 3 most represented countries were Mexico (27.1%), India (18.4%) and Brazil (8.3%).The majority of respondents were medical oncologists (44.4%)working in an academic setting (46.9%). Among respondents, 40.2% and 53.8% reported never having consulted the available international guidelines on fertility preservation and pregnancy after BC, respectively. 25.0%, 19.1% and 24.3% of respondents declared to be not at all knowledgeable about embryo, oocyte or ovarian tissue cryopreservation, respectively. 29.2%, 23.6% and 31.3% declared that embryo, oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation are not available in their countries, respectively. 57.6% of respondents disagreed or were neutral on the statement that controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) can be considered safe in BC pts; 29.9%suggested that COS should not be considered safe in pts with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease. 49.7% and 58.6% of respondents agreed or were neutral on the statement that pregnancy in BC survivors may increase the risk of recurrence overall or only in those with HR+ disease, respectively. In contrast, 49.0% agreed that COS in BC survivors can be safely considered.
Conclusions
Several misconceptions exist among physicians from LMIC on fertility and pregnancy-related issues in young BC pts. Increased awareness and further educational initiatives are needed to improve adherence to available guidelines and pts’oncofertility counseling.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
N.F. Ponde: Advisory/Consultancy: Lilly; Honoraria (self): Roche,Novartis, AstraZeneca and Lilly. M. Brandão: Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche/GNE. I.B. Spasojevic: Advisory/Consultancy: Roche, Novartis, Amicus; Honoraria (self): Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca. A. Odhiambo: Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis; Advisory/Consultancy: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Janssen. M. Tagliamento: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Takeda; Full/Part-time employment, Medical Writer: Novartis, Amgen. M. Lambertini: Advisory/Consultancy: Roche, Novartis; Honoraria (self): Roche, Takeda, Theramex, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
164P - The impact of sarcopenia on chemotherapy toxicity and survival rate among hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Elizabeth Marcella
Session: e-Poster Display Session
165P - Prognostic factors in sorafenib-treated hepatocellular carcinoma: Multicentre analysis of a European population sample
Presenter: João Gramaça
Session: e-Poster Display Session
166P - Differences and similarities in presentation and management patterns in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) across Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand
Presenter: Pierce Chow
Session: e-Poster Display Session
167P - Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in tertiary level hospitals in Bangladesh
Presenter: Abdullah Al Mamun Khan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
168P - Response assessments in hepatocellular carcinoma: What are the best criteria to utilize? mRECIST or RECIST 1.1? A retrospective meta-analysis of multiple phase III trials
Presenter: Oliver Bohnsack
Session: e-Poster Display Session
169P - IMbrave150: Management of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) for atezolizumab (atezo) and bevacizumab (bev) in unresectable HCC
Presenter: Masatoshi Kudo
Session: e-Poster Display Session
170P - Sintilimab plus anlotinib as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Xiaofeng Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
171P - Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib versus TACE plus sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT): A prospective randomized study
Presenter: Xiaoyan Ding
Session: e-Poster Display Session
172P - Triple combination therapy of lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Zhi-Cheng Lai
Session: e-Poster Display Session
173P - Regorafenib in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in real-world practice in Asia: Interim results from the observational REFINE study
Presenter: Ho Yeong Lim
Session: e-Poster Display Session