Abstract 321P
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic, detected first in December 2019, has led to four lakh deaths and close to 12 million being infected. It has led to disruption in mobility and access to healthcare due to measures such as social distancing and lockdown. Due to the infection, patients had difficulty to access transport facilities, interstate travel and obtaining permissions from authorities. All these factors led them not to adhere to their fixed appointments leading to an impact on outcome. Hence, with a collaborative effort from Oncologists and nursing staff, we explored the impact of COVID-19 and the lockdown on adherence to treatment among Cancer patients.
Methods
From April 1 to June 30, 2020, patient information was collected at the Day Care Unit, in the Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology at the American Oncology Institute, Serilingampally, Hyderabad, India. Patients with delay in treatment for more than 7 days were identified and followed up. Length of delay of treatment was recorded. All patients gave their informed consent for the study.
Results
A total of 737 patients underwent treatment. Number of patients who received treatment as per schedule were 656 (89%). Eighty-one patients out of a total of 737 (11%) during the 3-month COVID-19 period had treatment delays. Of these most treatment delays were due to fear of COVID infection (50.6%), followed by medical delays (26%) and transport and travel issues (23.4%). Impact of COVID per se on treatment delays was as low as 8%. A delay of 3- 7 days is usually acceptable for re initiating chemotherapy, to allow clinical and count recovery. Any delay beyond 7 days was considered nonadherence to treatment schedule. Most delays were shorter, less than 14 days (68%). Most of the delays were in the elderly age group (more than 50 years). Among patients missing their schedule, those more than 50 years and less than 50 years were 75 and 6 patients respectively. This was assessed in view of the increased mortality due to COVID in elderly patients.
Conclusions
Despite the pandemic and subsequent nationwide lockdown, treatment nonadherence due to COVID-19 was low, short and mostly seen in the elderly group. Cancer patients tend to continue treatment despite the COVID crises, and this requires validation in a longitudinal cohort.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
104P - Safety and efficacy of HLX04 versus reference bevacizumab in combination with XELOX or mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomised, double-blind phase III study
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
105P - Prospective, open-label, observational study of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC): The OPTIM1SE study
Presenter: Tsai-Sheng Yang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
106P - Efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine and mitomycin-C based concurrent radiotherapy in patients with anal canal cancer
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: e-Poster Display Session
107P - Safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from the Australian cohort of the phase IIIb, international, open-label, early-access PRECONNECT study
Presenter: Timothy Price
Session: e-Poster Display Session
108P - Comparative analysis of two-stage hepatectomy and enhanced one-stage hepatectomy in the setting of bilobar colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Hayk Torgomyan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
109P - Efficacy and safety of biweekly or triweekly XELOX regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer
Presenter: hangyu zhang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
110P - Analysis for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) effect for colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Wei Zou
Session: e-Poster Display Session
111P - A meta-analysis study on safety and effectiveness comparison between FOLFOX and XELOX regiments on advanced stage colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
112P - Pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Asia subgroup results of the phase III KEYNOTE-177 study
Presenter: Takayuki Yoshino
Session: e-Poster Display Session
122P - Nomogram to predict short-term effect of radiotherapy based on pre/post-treatment inflammatory biomarkers and their dynamic changes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Shuai Liang
Session: e-Poster Display Session