Abstract 343P
Background
Palonosetron was greater than first-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the prevention of nausea and vomiting have been established in many systematic reviews. However, several recent randomized control trials manifested inconsistent results. Thus, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of palonosetron versus granisetron in chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).
Methods
The PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published before April 2020. The meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled effect sizes by using a random effect model. The primary outcome was treatment responses of CINV (complete response rate, complete control rate, and total control rate). Secondary outcomes were 5-HT3 receptor antagonist related common side effects (constipation, and headache).
Results
Twelve randomized controlled trials, three prospective studies and one retrospective study were reviewed. Palonosetron was consistently statistically superior in any phase of complete response rate (acute phases: odds ratio [OR]= 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 1.82; delayed phases: OR= 1.57, 95% CI: 1.15 to 2.15; overall phases: OR= 1.37, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.60), delayed phases of complete control rate and total control rate (OR= 1.45, 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.72; OR= 1.29, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.65, respectively). Subgroup analysis indicated that there was no significant difference between palonosetron and granisetron in any phase of complete response when combined with NK1 antagonists. No statistically significant difference was found between constipation and diarrhea toxicities of the two groups.
Conclusions
Although palonosetron significantly decreased the risk of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in any phase, granisetron is seeming comparable effectiveness with palonosetron when adding NK1 antagonists.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
424P - Hippocampus sparing in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for brain tumour radiotherapy treatment
Presenter: Eva Yi Wah Cheung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
425P - The impact of obesity on treatment outcomes in patients with solid tumour malignancies treated with first-line (1L) immuno-oncology (IO) agents
Presenter: Chun Loo Gan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
426P - A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase II study of lenvatinib (LEN) in patients (pts) with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a daily oral starting dose of 18 mg vs 24 mg
Presenter: Marcia S. Brose
Session: e-Poster Display Session
427P - On the clinical implications of systemic and local immune responses in human angiosarcoma
Presenter: Jason Yongsheng Chan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
428P - Prognostic value of clinico-pathological characteristics and peripheral monocyte counts in localised extra-meningeal solitary fibrous tumours treated with surgical resection
Presenter: Ryan Lim
Session: e-Poster Display Session
429P - Demographics, pattern of care, and outcome analysis of malignant melanoma cases from a tertiary care centre in India
Presenter: Anshul Agarwal
Session: e-Poster Display Session
430P - Teenagers and young adult cancers in rural central India: Access to age-appropriate care
Presenter: Runu Sharma
Session: e-Poster Display Session
431P - Quantitative study of two critical lncRNAs in patients with glioma tumours
Presenter: Kamal Mohammadian
Session: e-Poster Display Session
432P - Efficacy and tolerability of vismodegib treatment in locally advanced and metastatic basal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Mustafa Gürbüz
Session: e-Poster Display Session
433P - Association between aspirin and cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization analysis
Presenter: Yu Jiang
Session: e-Poster Display Session