Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

e-Poster Display Session

424P - Hippocampus sparing in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for brain tumour radiotherapy treatment

Date

22 Nov 2020

Session

e-Poster Display Session

Topics

Radiation Oncology

Tumour Site

Central Nervous System Malignancies

Presenters

Eva Yi Wah Cheung

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_6): S1407-S1415. 10.1016/annonc/annonc368

Authors

E.Y.W. Cheung, H.Y. Lee, T.L. Lau, P.Y. Lau, P.Y. Wat

Author affiliations

  • Mhs, TWC-Tung Wah College:King's Park Campus, 000 - Kowloon/HK

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 424P

Background

Radiotherapy is a primary or an adjuvant treatment for most brain tumor patients for better tumors control and prolong survival [1]. However, cranial irradiation may cause damages to hippocampus (plural: hippocampi), which may induce dementia after they recovered from the disease [2]. To minimise radiation dose to hippocampus becomes a new trend in radiation therapy [3], [4]. This study is to investigate whether traditional coplanar VMAT (CO-VMAT) or proposed non-coplanar VMAT (NC-VMAT) is dosimetrically superior for brain tumor radiotherapy treatment in view of hippocampus sparing.

Methods

Both CO-VMAT plan and NC-VMAT plan were generated for 16 brain tumor patients (Glioblastoma: 11, Meningioma: 5) using Varian Eclipse planning system version 15.6. The prescription was to give 54 Gy to PTV in 30 fractions. Dose constraints applied for plan optimization were benchmarked against Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). In the CO-VMAT plans, there were 1 full arc (179°-181°) and 2 half arcs. The couch angle for all arcs were 0°. For cases with PTV located at the left side of the brain, the gantry angle for the 2 half arcs were set from 0°to 179° and 179° to 0°. While for cases with PTV on the right side of the brain, the gantry angle of the 2 half arcs were set from 0° to 181°and 181°to 0°. In the NC-VMAT plans, all setting were the same as CO-VMAT plans, except that the couch angle for the 2 half arcs was at 315° for PTV located at the left side of the brain, and 45° for PTV located on the right side of the brain.

Results

Homogeneity index, conformation number, dose to other organs at risk and ipsilateral hippocampus were similar in CO-VMAT and NC-VMAT plans. The maximum dose (D-MaxCH) received by contralateral hippocampus in NC-VMAT is 4Gy lower (p=0.049) than that of the CO-VMAT. The dose received by 40 % of the contralateral hippocampus (D40%CH) in NC-VMAT is 1.46Gy (p=0.003) lower than that of the CO-VMAT. The mean D-MaxCH and mean D40%CH were reduced by 23% and 23.5% respectively in NC-VMAT plans when compared with CO-VMAT.

Conclusions

The NC-VMAT is able to minimize radiation dose to contralateral hippocampus while maintaining good plan quality. The NC-VMAT approach may help to consolidate the development of a new standard of care for brain tumor patients.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Tung Wah College.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.