Abstract 343P
Background
Palonosetron was greater than first-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the prevention of nausea and vomiting have been established in many systematic reviews. However, several recent randomized control trials manifested inconsistent results. Thus, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of palonosetron versus granisetron in chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).
Methods
The PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published before April 2020. The meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled effect sizes by using a random effect model. The primary outcome was treatment responses of CINV (complete response rate, complete control rate, and total control rate). Secondary outcomes were 5-HT3 receptor antagonist related common side effects (constipation, and headache).
Results
Twelve randomized controlled trials, three prospective studies and one retrospective study were reviewed. Palonosetron was consistently statistically superior in any phase of complete response rate (acute phases: odds ratio [OR]= 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 1.82; delayed phases: OR= 1.57, 95% CI: 1.15 to 2.15; overall phases: OR= 1.37, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.60), delayed phases of complete control rate and total control rate (OR= 1.45, 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.72; OR= 1.29, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.65, respectively). Subgroup analysis indicated that there was no significant difference between palonosetron and granisetron in any phase of complete response when combined with NK1 antagonists. No statistically significant difference was found between constipation and diarrhea toxicities of the two groups.
Conclusions
Although palonosetron significantly decreased the risk of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in any phase, granisetron is seeming comparable effectiveness with palonosetron when adding NK1 antagonists.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
413P - South Korean real-world treatment patterns in patients with EGFRm NSCLC
Presenter: Jae Cheol Lee
Session: e-Poster Display Session
414P - Incidence and characteristics of lung cancer diagnosed after kidney transplantation at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute
Presenter: Adeline Gonzales
Session: e-Poster Display Session
415P - Real-world fusion landscape of RET gene fusions and its response to cabozantinib in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using next generation sequencing
Presenter: Chunwei Xu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
416P - A single institute study evaluating the additional benefit of blood NGS testing over conventional molecular testing in metastatic adenocarcinoma lung
Presenter: Rajashree Ashwath
Session: e-Poster Display Session
417P - Efficacy and safety of lorlatinib in subsequent lines of therapy in ALK and ROS1 positive lung cancer
Presenter: Amit Kumar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
418P - All EGFR mutations are (not) created equal: Focus on uncommon EGFR mutations
Presenter: Ullas Batra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
419P - Surgical treatment of malignant tumours and metastatic lesions of the chest wall
Presenter: Zhanat Pyssanova
Session: e-Poster Display Session
421P - A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, phase III trial of lenvatinib (LEN) in patients (pts) with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) in China
Presenter: Ming Gao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
422P - Response rate and time to progression after first line chemotherapy with cisplatin and adriamycin in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma at presentation
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
423P - Positive lymph node and thicker Breslow are associated with poor prognosis of high-risk resected melanomas
Presenter: Roby Cahyono
Session: e-Poster Display Session