Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

e-Poster Display Session

416P - A single institute study evaluating the additional benefit of blood NGS testing over conventional molecular testing in metastatic adenocarcinoma lung

Date

22 Nov 2020

Session

e-Poster Display Session

Topics

Translational Research

Tumour Site

Presenters

Rajashree Ashwath

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_6): S1386-S1406. 10.1016/annonc/annonc367

Authors

R. Ashwath1, A. Rauthan1, P. Patil2, K. Gupta2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center Manipal Hospital, 560017 - Bangalore/IN
  • 2 Medical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center Manipal Hospital, 560017 - bangalore/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 416P

Background

Identification of molecular subgroups has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic adenocarcinoma lung.Practice in India is to test for EGFR hotspot mutations by PCR, ALK by IHC and ROS1 by FISH (conventional testing).Tissue NGS (next generation sequencing) testing is increasing; but availability of adequate tissue is a problem.Aim of our study was to evaluate the added benefit of blood NGS testing in patients who were negative by conventional molecular testing.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic lung cancer, who presented at Manipal hospital, Bangalore, Jan 2019 and May 2020.

Results

108 patients, 35-75 years, were analyzed. 78 (72%) men, 30(28%) women. 87 (80.6%) had adeno and 21 (19.4%) had squamous cell carcinoma. All adenocarcinoma patients were tested on tumor tissue for EGFR hotspot mutations by PCR, ALK by IHC and ROS1 by FISH. Molecular alterations by conventional testing were found in 34 (39%) patients and 53(61%) were negative. Out of these 34, 29 (33%) had EGFR, 3 (3.1%) had ALK and 2 (2.4%) had ROS1 alterations. We further evaluated the conventionally tested negative patients to blood NGS testing (liquid biopsy). Only 20 (37%) out of the 53 conventionally tested negative patients were subjected to blood NGS testing due to logistic reasons. We found 14 (70%) out of 20 had detectable mutation on blood NGS. Out of the 14, we picked up 6(42%) EGFR (3 common, 3 uncommon), 1 (7 %) ALK, 1 (7 %) ROS1, 1 (7 %) MET exon 14 skip, 2 ( 14%) HER 2 and 3 (21 %) RAS mutations (G12C). We treated 10(50%) out of 20 subjects: 5 EGFR mutation patients with geftinib/afatinib/ osimertinib, 1 ALK with crizotinib, 1 ROS with crizotinib, 1 MET with Capmatinib, and 2 HER2 with Afatinib.

Conclusions

Findings of our study proves patients who are negative by conventional testing should be further evaluated with blood NGS testing. In our study, inspite of limited testing, we were able to detect additional 14 patients with driver mutations by doing blood NGS testing, thus increasing our mutation detection from 39% to 55%.Advantage of blood NGS testing is ease of sample collection, faster turnaround time, that it is able to overcome the common problem of inadequate tissue in lung cancer.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.