Abstract 229P
Background
Fatigue is a common adverse effect suffered by prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). A growing body of evidence has proposed exercise as a treatment to relieve and prevent the adverse effects of ADT. Recently, high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of supervised exercise have been conducted to get more assessment. However, the pooled estimate for the effect of supervised exercise on fatigue has not been established yet. This study aims to determine the pooled effect of supervised exercise on fatigue in prostate cancer patients receiving ADT.
Methods
A literature search was conducted from PubMed, Clinicaltrial, and Cochrane Library, published up to January 2020 following the PRISMA guideline. We screened RCTs with our inclusion criteria and assessed the quality using the tools provided by Cochrane. The primary outcome analyzed in this study was fatigue measured as Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Subgroup analysis was conducted to determine the difference in exercise duration (<12 weeks and >12 weeks), modality (aerobic, resistance, and combination), and the onset of ADT (initiation and long-term). All analysis was performed using STATA 16.
Results
A total of 7 RCTs comprising 455 patients reported the fatigue using the FACIT-Fatigue, EORTC QLQ-C30, and Schwartz Cancer Fatigue Scale. The included studies presented a low risk of bias. Supervised exercise showed an overall reduction on fatigue (SMD = 0.25, 95%CI 0.07-0.44, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%). The subgroup test results showed no significant difference between exercise duration (p = 0.4), modality (p = 0.67), and onset of ADT (p = 0.57). The Egger’s test results showed no indication of publication bias (p = 0.64).
Conclusions
Supervised exercise reduces fatigue in prostate cancer patients receiving ADT. The available data show that there is no difference between exercise duration and modality. Furthermore, our findings highlight the benefits of supervised exercise in the initiation of ADT for preventing toxicities as well as relieving adverse effects in long-term ADT.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
104P - Safety and efficacy of HLX04 versus reference bevacizumab in combination with XELOX or mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomised, double-blind phase III study
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
105P - Prospective, open-label, observational study of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC): The OPTIM1SE study
Presenter: Tsai-Sheng Yang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
106P - Efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine and mitomycin-C based concurrent radiotherapy in patients with anal canal cancer
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: e-Poster Display Session
107P - Safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from the Australian cohort of the phase IIIb, international, open-label, early-access PRECONNECT study
Presenter: Timothy Price
Session: e-Poster Display Session
108P - Comparative analysis of two-stage hepatectomy and enhanced one-stage hepatectomy in the setting of bilobar colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Hayk Torgomyan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
109P - Efficacy and safety of biweekly or triweekly XELOX regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer
Presenter: hangyu zhang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
110P - Analysis for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) effect for colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Wei Zou
Session: e-Poster Display Session
111P - A meta-analysis study on safety and effectiveness comparison between FOLFOX and XELOX regiments on advanced stage colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
112P - Pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Asia subgroup results of the phase III KEYNOTE-177 study
Presenter: Takayuki Yoshino
Session: e-Poster Display Session
122P - Nomogram to predict short-term effect of radiotherapy based on pre/post-treatment inflammatory biomarkers and their dynamic changes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Shuai Liang
Session: e-Poster Display Session