Abstract 409P
Background
Chemotherapy is the basic treatments for lung cancer, and nausea and vomiting is one of the most common adverse event of chemotherapy, which decrease the life quality. As a result, how to prevent chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting(CINV) is an important subject faced by oncologists. The granisetron transdermal delivery system (GTDS) has been developed to deliver granisetron continuously over 7 days to prevent CINV. Some previous cases receiving multiday highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) regimens showed that the GTDS plus dexamethasone was not inferior to the GTDS plus dexamethasone and aprepitant. But there is no similar studies at home and abroad.
Methods
Our study prospectively assessed the non-inferiority of the GTDS plus dexamethasone to the GTDS plus dexamethasone and aprepitant in patients receiving multiday HEC. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with complete control of CINV from chemotherapy initiation until 24 h after final administration. The study has already enrolled 40 patients, 21 patients with two regimens, and 19 patients with three regimens before receiving multiday HEC.
Results
Between January 2019 and June 2020, 40 patients was recruited in the analysis. The GTDS plus dexamethasone group displayed non-inferiority to The GTDS plus dexamethasone and aprepitant group, complete control was achieved by 63.6% of patients in the two regimens group, and 65.4% in the three regimens group (P>0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated, the most common adverse events are manageable.
Conclusions
Current guidelines for the management of multiday HEC recommend three regimens therapy. Our study indicate that the two regimens therapy provides effective, well-tolerated control of multiday HEC. It offers a alternative route for delivering two regimens for up to 7 days that is as effective as three regimens.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
210P - Prognostic value of sarcopenia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review
Presenter: Angeline Tancherla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
211P - The impact of low muscle mass to overall survival in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Karunia Japar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
213P - Stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Predictors of relapse and outcomes for adjuvant carboplatin vs active surveillance
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
214P - Study of treatment outcome in adults with TFE related RCC
Presenter: Ajaykumar Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
215P - Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of responses in metastatic sites with nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: e-Poster Display Session
216P - Clinical profile and treatment outcome of testicular seminoma treated at tertiary care centre in Chennai
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
220P - A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Winnie Sung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
221P - Patient-reported sexual and urinary function in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) when treated with apalutamide (APA) vs placebo (PBO) and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in SPARTAN
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
222P - Tolerability and treatment response to darolutamide (DARO) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the phase III ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Matthew R. Smith
Session: e-Poster Display Session