Abstract 409P
Background
Chemotherapy is the basic treatments for lung cancer, and nausea and vomiting is one of the most common adverse event of chemotherapy, which decrease the life quality. As a result, how to prevent chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting(CINV) is an important subject faced by oncologists. The granisetron transdermal delivery system (GTDS) has been developed to deliver granisetron continuously over 7 days to prevent CINV. Some previous cases receiving multiday highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) regimens showed that the GTDS plus dexamethasone was not inferior to the GTDS plus dexamethasone and aprepitant. But there is no similar studies at home and abroad.
Methods
Our study prospectively assessed the non-inferiority of the GTDS plus dexamethasone to the GTDS plus dexamethasone and aprepitant in patients receiving multiday HEC. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with complete control of CINV from chemotherapy initiation until 24 h after final administration. The study has already enrolled 40 patients, 21 patients with two regimens, and 19 patients with three regimens before receiving multiday HEC.
Results
Between January 2019 and June 2020, 40 patients was recruited in the analysis. The GTDS plus dexamethasone group displayed non-inferiority to The GTDS plus dexamethasone and aprepitant group, complete control was achieved by 63.6% of patients in the two regimens group, and 65.4% in the three regimens group (P>0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated, the most common adverse events are manageable.
Conclusions
Current guidelines for the management of multiday HEC recommend three regimens therapy. Our study indicate that the two regimens therapy provides effective, well-tolerated control of multiday HEC. It offers a alternative route for delivering two regimens for up to 7 days that is as effective as three regimens.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
434P - Pan-Canadian evidence-based, consensus-driven cancer treatment protocols/information for use at the point of care by medical oncologists? Is there a need?
Presenter: Kiran Virik
Session: e-Poster Display Session
435P - Hypnotics and risk of cancer: A meta-analysis of observational studies
Presenter: Tzu Rong Peng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
436P - Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of adolescent and young adult (AYA) melanoma: Results from an Asian perspective
Presenter: Wei Lin Goh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
437P - Long-term efficacy and toxicity outcome of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy for medullary thyroid cancer: A single institution cohort study
Presenter: Ka Man Cheung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
438P - Real-world data of relapse after adjuvant treatment (Tx) in high-risk melanoma
Presenter: Carolina Ortiz Velez
Session: e-Poster Display Session
439P - Immunohistochemical analysis of p53 and Ki-67 in glioblastoma (GBM) and their correlations with patient survival
Presenter: Paulo Luz
Session: e-Poster Display Session
440P - Blinded independent central review of oncology trials: The monitoring of readers' performance
Presenter: Hubert Beaumont
Session: e-Poster Display Session
441P - Influence of radiation therapy of patients with somatotropic pituitary adenomas depending on the age of patients
Presenter: Saodat Issaeva
Session: e-Poster Display Session
442P - Results from the registrational phase I/II ARROW trial of pralsetinib (BLU-667) in patients (pts) with advanced RET mutation-positive medullary thyroid cancer (RET+ MTC)
Presenter: Bhumsuk Keam
Session: e-Poster Display Session