Abstract 429P
Background
Melanoma care is revolutionized with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and targeted therapies; however, access to drugs is challenging in Low-Middle income countries (LMICs).
Methods
Histologically proven melanoma cases registered from 2013–2019 were analysed.
Results
There were 443 patients with median age of 54 years; 60% were males with 41% cutaneous, and 57% mucosal melanomas; most common primary sites were anorectal (41%) and extremities (27%); 11% were BRAF mutated. Among the 258 non-metastatic patients, the median follow up was 30 months (0–83 months). Of these, 114 (44%) had prior surgery and 73 (64%) were already metastatic at presentation to us. Of the remaining 144 (56%), 101 underwent resection, 11 were unresectable, and rest 32 did not take treatment. Median EFS of non-metastatic patients was 17 (95% CI: 11-23) months while median OS was 38 months (95% CI: 30-46); 2-years OS predictions was 66% (95% CI: 59-73). Overall metastatic cohort (n=311) comprised of baseline metastatic (n=185) and non-metastatic patients with (73) or without prior therapy (53) who failed with distant metastasis.Commonest metastatic sites were liver (52%) and non-regional nodes (51%). Median follow up in this cohort was 21 (0–74 months); 138 (44.4%) received chemotherapy(taxane, dacarbazine), Interferons, while 29 (9.3%) patients received CPI. The clinical benefit rate was 31%. In baseline metastatic cohort, the median EFS and OS with BSC alone were 3.8 (95% CI: 2.6-5.0) months and 3.5 (95% CI: 2.45-4.63) vs. 5.55 (95% CI: 3-8) months and 11 (95% CI: 9-13.1) months in any systemic therapy group (HR for OS: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.22-0.52; P<0.001). Grade 3/4 toxicity were observed in 16 % with predominance of thrombocytopenia and anemia (both 4%) in chemotherapy and anemia (10%) for CPI. Any therapy received was significant in both cohort;additionally, site, surgery, were significant in non-metastatic cohort.
Conclusions
This real-world data from India reflects the hard reality of access of expensive, standard of care therapies. Interesting finding that any systemic therapy can lead to meaningful clinical benefits at-least in a select group of patients merits exploration if standard options are not feasible, especially in LMICs.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
163P - Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) in an Asian institution from 2002 to 2018
Presenter: Evelyn Yi Ting Wong
Session: e-Poster Display Session
164P - The impact of sarcopenia on chemotherapy toxicity and survival rate among hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Elizabeth Marcella
Session: e-Poster Display Session
165P - Prognostic factors in sorafenib-treated hepatocellular carcinoma: Multicentre analysis of a European population sample
Presenter: João Gramaça
Session: e-Poster Display Session
166P - Differences and similarities in presentation and management patterns in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) across Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand
Presenter: Pierce Chow
Session: e-Poster Display Session
167P - Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in tertiary level hospitals in Bangladesh
Presenter: Abdullah Al Mamun Khan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
168P - Response assessments in hepatocellular carcinoma: What are the best criteria to utilize? mRECIST or RECIST 1.1? A retrospective meta-analysis of multiple phase III trials
Presenter: Oliver Bohnsack
Session: e-Poster Display Session
169P - IMbrave150: Management of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) for atezolizumab (atezo) and bevacizumab (bev) in unresectable HCC
Presenter: Masatoshi Kudo
Session: e-Poster Display Session
170P - Sintilimab plus anlotinib as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Xiaofeng Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
171P - Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib versus TACE plus sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT): A prospective randomized study
Presenter: Xiaoyan Ding
Session: e-Poster Display Session
172P - Triple combination therapy of lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Zhi-Cheng Lai
Session: e-Poster Display Session