Abstract 429P
Background
Melanoma care is revolutionized with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and targeted therapies; however, access to drugs is challenging in Low-Middle income countries (LMICs).
Methods
Histologically proven melanoma cases registered from 2013–2019 were analysed.
Results
There were 443 patients with median age of 54 years; 60% were males with 41% cutaneous, and 57% mucosal melanomas; most common primary sites were anorectal (41%) and extremities (27%); 11% were BRAF mutated. Among the 258 non-metastatic patients, the median follow up was 30 months (0–83 months). Of these, 114 (44%) had prior surgery and 73 (64%) were already metastatic at presentation to us. Of the remaining 144 (56%), 101 underwent resection, 11 were unresectable, and rest 32 did not take treatment. Median EFS of non-metastatic patients was 17 (95% CI: 11-23) months while median OS was 38 months (95% CI: 30-46); 2-years OS predictions was 66% (95% CI: 59-73). Overall metastatic cohort (n=311) comprised of baseline metastatic (n=185) and non-metastatic patients with (73) or without prior therapy (53) who failed with distant metastasis.Commonest metastatic sites were liver (52%) and non-regional nodes (51%). Median follow up in this cohort was 21 (0–74 months); 138 (44.4%) received chemotherapy(taxane, dacarbazine), Interferons, while 29 (9.3%) patients received CPI. The clinical benefit rate was 31%. In baseline metastatic cohort, the median EFS and OS with BSC alone were 3.8 (95% CI: 2.6-5.0) months and 3.5 (95% CI: 2.45-4.63) vs. 5.55 (95% CI: 3-8) months and 11 (95% CI: 9-13.1) months in any systemic therapy group (HR for OS: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.22-0.52; P<0.001). Grade 3/4 toxicity were observed in 16 % with predominance of thrombocytopenia and anemia (both 4%) in chemotherapy and anemia (10%) for CPI. Any therapy received was significant in both cohort;additionally, site, surgery, were significant in non-metastatic cohort.
Conclusions
This real-world data from India reflects the hard reality of access of expensive, standard of care therapies. Interesting finding that any systemic therapy can lead to meaningful clinical benefits at-least in a select group of patients merits exploration if standard options are not feasible, especially in LMICs.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
153P - Mutational landscape of gastric cancer (GC) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) in Asia from 2015-2019
Presenter: Evelyn Yi Ting Wong
Session: e-Poster Display Session
154P - A multicenter, prospective study of apatinib plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Yi-Hui Tang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
155P - Surgical outcomes and technical performance of robotic versus laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A prospective comparative study FUGES-014
Presenter: Hua-Gen Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
156P - Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy during total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer: A randomized clinical trial
Presenter: Jian-Xian Lin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
157P - Efficacy and safety of penpulimab (AK105), a new generation anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody, in upper gastrointestinal cancers
Presenter: Amy Prawira
Session: e-Poster Display Session
158P - A phase II study of trastuzumab with S-1 plus oxaliplatin for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (HIGHSOX study): Final report
Presenter: Atsuo Takashima
Session: e-Poster Display Session
159P - Open surgery can improve the 3-year postoperative survival in some patients with advanced gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic surgery: A multicenter, propensity score matching, in-depth analysis
Presenter: Ze-Ning Huang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
160P - Phase II study of sintilimab combined with FLOT regimen for neoadjuvant treatment of gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Ning Li
Session: e-Poster Display Session
161P - Adjuvant tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) versus platinum-based chemotherapies for resectable gastric cancer: Real-world experience and a propensity score matching analysis
Presenter: Chih Chieh Yen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
162P - Evaluation of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in monitoring anastomotic leakage after radical total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Presenter: Ru-Hong Tu
Session: e-Poster Display Session