Abstract 429P
Background
Melanoma care is revolutionized with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and targeted therapies; however, access to drugs is challenging in Low-Middle income countries (LMICs).
Methods
Histologically proven melanoma cases registered from 2013–2019 were analysed.
Results
There were 443 patients with median age of 54 years; 60% were males with 41% cutaneous, and 57% mucosal melanomas; most common primary sites were anorectal (41%) and extremities (27%); 11% were BRAF mutated. Among the 258 non-metastatic patients, the median follow up was 30 months (0–83 months). Of these, 114 (44%) had prior surgery and 73 (64%) were already metastatic at presentation to us. Of the remaining 144 (56%), 101 underwent resection, 11 were unresectable, and rest 32 did not take treatment. Median EFS of non-metastatic patients was 17 (95% CI: 11-23) months while median OS was 38 months (95% CI: 30-46); 2-years OS predictions was 66% (95% CI: 59-73). Overall metastatic cohort (n=311) comprised of baseline metastatic (n=185) and non-metastatic patients with (73) or without prior therapy (53) who failed with distant metastasis.Commonest metastatic sites were liver (52%) and non-regional nodes (51%). Median follow up in this cohort was 21 (0–74 months); 138 (44.4%) received chemotherapy(taxane, dacarbazine), Interferons, while 29 (9.3%) patients received CPI. The clinical benefit rate was 31%. In baseline metastatic cohort, the median EFS and OS with BSC alone were 3.8 (95% CI: 2.6-5.0) months and 3.5 (95% CI: 2.45-4.63) vs. 5.55 (95% CI: 3-8) months and 11 (95% CI: 9-13.1) months in any systemic therapy group (HR for OS: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.22-0.52; P<0.001). Grade 3/4 toxicity were observed in 16 % with predominance of thrombocytopenia and anemia (both 4%) in chemotherapy and anemia (10%) for CPI. Any therapy received was significant in both cohort;additionally, site, surgery, were significant in non-metastatic cohort.
Conclusions
This real-world data from India reflects the hard reality of access of expensive, standard of care therapies. Interesting finding that any systemic therapy can lead to meaningful clinical benefits at-least in a select group of patients merits exploration if standard options are not feasible, especially in LMICs.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
223P - Overall survival (OS) results of phase III ARAMIS study of darolutamide (DARO) added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)
Presenter: Karim Fizazi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
224P - Associations of pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) with treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer: A real-world, population-based study
Presenter: Atul Batra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
225P - Prostate cancer treatments and outcomes in the elderly: A retrospective analysis of an Australian real-world cohort
Presenter: Michael Fernando
Session: e-Poster Display Session
226P - Use of PSMA PET in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Andrew Jensen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
227P - Phase II study of pembrolizumab (pembro) plus enzalutamide for enzalutamide (enza)-resistant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Cohorts (C) 4 and 5 update from KEYNOTE-199
Presenter: Ulka Vaishampayan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
228P - Symptoms and impacts of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) among Japanese patients designated to receive Ra-223
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
229P - Expanding the role of supervised exercise on fatigue in prostate cancer patient receiving androgen deprivation therapy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
Presenter: Niwanda Yogiswara
Session: e-Poster Display Session
230P - Molecular profiling and clinical characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer
Presenter: Ranlu Liu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
231P - Phase II study of pembrolizumab in docetaxel-pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Updated follow-up of cohorts (C) 1-3 from KEYNOTE-199
Presenter: Jeffrey Goh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
232P - Real-world data on metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide: A regional experience
Presenter: Rachel Raju
Session: e-Poster Display Session