Abstract 137P
Background
Circulating tumor DNA (CtDNA) has shown its negative prognostic value in a number of studies, however, data on the role of ctDNA in resectable gastric cancer (GC) are lacking. The aim of our study was to determine the prognostic value of ctDNA at various stages of the disease using our simple and cheap test.
Methods
This prospective study included patients with diagnosis of GC who received treatment from 2017 to 2019. Tumor somatic mutations were determined by target sequencing of DNA from FFPE tumor blocks. Sequencing was performed using the custom NGS panel covering regions of frequent somatic mutations in 50 genes. Tumor-specific mutations were monitored by ddPCR in plasma samples taken before and after surgery in case of resectable GC (n=42) and before and during chemotherapy in case of advanced GC (n=13). The median time between surgery and blood sampling was 7 days (5-15 days, σ 2.3). The plasma sample was considered "positive” if the content of ctDNA was more than 0.5 copies of mutant DNA in ml plasma.
Results
Tumor-derived mutations were found in plasma with sensitivity of 74.5% (n=55): in stage IV (n=13) – 92.3%, stage III (n=24) – 70.8%, stage II (n=11) – 81.8% and in stage I (n=7) – 100%. In the group with resectable GC 24 (57.1%) pts received adjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy. Detection of ctDNA before surgery did not affect DFS (HR 0.7, 95%CI 0.04-11.5, p=0.8). In 10 (23.8%) cases ctDNA was determined after surgery. Progression of the disease was detected in 6/10 (50%) pts with ctDNA(+) and 6/32 (18.8%) - in ctDNA(-) pts (p = 0.012). One-year DFS in ctDNA(+) and ctDNA(-) pts with resectable GC after surgery were 25.4% and 73.2%, respectively. ctDNA positivity after surgery was an independent negative prognostic factor according to Cox regression model fitted to T, N, and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 6.6, 95%CI 1.5-30, p =0.014).
Conclusions
A robust and economical assay of ctDNA detection is sensitive and demonstrates the prognostic significance of ctDNA persisting after surgery in pts with the early stage of the GC. Further clinical validation of this approach is required in trails with modifications of the perioperative treatment, in terms of escalation and de-escalation, according to the content of ctDNA.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
This research is conducted under the auspices of the experimental governmental assignment of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation and coordinated by the FSBI “Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
104P - Safety and efficacy of HLX04 versus reference bevacizumab in combination with XELOX or mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomised, double-blind phase III study
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
105P - Prospective, open-label, observational study of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC): The OPTIM1SE study
Presenter: Tsai-Sheng Yang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
106P - Efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine and mitomycin-C based concurrent radiotherapy in patients with anal canal cancer
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: e-Poster Display Session
107P - Safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from the Australian cohort of the phase IIIb, international, open-label, early-access PRECONNECT study
Presenter: Timothy Price
Session: e-Poster Display Session
108P - Comparative analysis of two-stage hepatectomy and enhanced one-stage hepatectomy in the setting of bilobar colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Hayk Torgomyan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
109P - Efficacy and safety of biweekly or triweekly XELOX regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer
Presenter: hangyu zhang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
110P - Analysis for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) effect for colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Wei Zou
Session: e-Poster Display Session
111P - A meta-analysis study on safety and effectiveness comparison between FOLFOX and XELOX regiments on advanced stage colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
112P - Pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Asia subgroup results of the phase III KEYNOTE-177 study
Presenter: Takayuki Yoshino
Session: e-Poster Display Session
122P - Nomogram to predict short-term effect of radiotherapy based on pre/post-treatment inflammatory biomarkers and their dynamic changes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Shuai Liang
Session: e-Poster Display Session