Abstract 137P
Background
Circulating tumor DNA (CtDNA) has shown its negative prognostic value in a number of studies, however, data on the role of ctDNA in resectable gastric cancer (GC) are lacking. The aim of our study was to determine the prognostic value of ctDNA at various stages of the disease using our simple and cheap test.
Methods
This prospective study included patients with diagnosis of GC who received treatment from 2017 to 2019. Tumor somatic mutations were determined by target sequencing of DNA from FFPE tumor blocks. Sequencing was performed using the custom NGS panel covering regions of frequent somatic mutations in 50 genes. Tumor-specific mutations were monitored by ddPCR in plasma samples taken before and after surgery in case of resectable GC (n=42) and before and during chemotherapy in case of advanced GC (n=13). The median time between surgery and blood sampling was 7 days (5-15 days, σ 2.3). The plasma sample was considered "positive” if the content of ctDNA was more than 0.5 copies of mutant DNA in ml plasma.
Results
Tumor-derived mutations were found in plasma with sensitivity of 74.5% (n=55): in stage IV (n=13) – 92.3%, stage III (n=24) – 70.8%, stage II (n=11) – 81.8% and in stage I (n=7) – 100%. In the group with resectable GC 24 (57.1%) pts received adjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy. Detection of ctDNA before surgery did not affect DFS (HR 0.7, 95%CI 0.04-11.5, p=0.8). In 10 (23.8%) cases ctDNA was determined after surgery. Progression of the disease was detected in 6/10 (50%) pts with ctDNA(+) and 6/32 (18.8%) - in ctDNA(-) pts (p = 0.012). One-year DFS in ctDNA(+) and ctDNA(-) pts with resectable GC after surgery were 25.4% and 73.2%, respectively. ctDNA positivity after surgery was an independent negative prognostic factor according to Cox regression model fitted to T, N, and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 6.6, 95%CI 1.5-30, p =0.014).
Conclusions
A robust and economical assay of ctDNA detection is sensitive and demonstrates the prognostic significance of ctDNA persisting after surgery in pts with the early stage of the GC. Further clinical validation of this approach is required in trails with modifications of the perioperative treatment, in terms of escalation and de-escalation, according to the content of ctDNA.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
This research is conducted under the auspices of the experimental governmental assignment of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation and coordinated by the FSBI “Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
164P - The impact of sarcopenia on chemotherapy toxicity and survival rate among hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Elizabeth Marcella
Session: e-Poster Display Session
165P - Prognostic factors in sorafenib-treated hepatocellular carcinoma: Multicentre analysis of a European population sample
Presenter: João Gramaça
Session: e-Poster Display Session
166P - Differences and similarities in presentation and management patterns in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) across Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand
Presenter: Pierce Chow
Session: e-Poster Display Session
167P - Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in tertiary level hospitals in Bangladesh
Presenter: Abdullah Al Mamun Khan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
168P - Response assessments in hepatocellular carcinoma: What are the best criteria to utilize? mRECIST or RECIST 1.1? A retrospective meta-analysis of multiple phase III trials
Presenter: Oliver Bohnsack
Session: e-Poster Display Session
169P - IMbrave150: Management of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) for atezolizumab (atezo) and bevacizumab (bev) in unresectable HCC
Presenter: Masatoshi Kudo
Session: e-Poster Display Session
170P - Sintilimab plus anlotinib as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Xiaofeng Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
171P - Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib versus TACE plus sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT): A prospective randomized study
Presenter: Xiaoyan Ding
Session: e-Poster Display Session
172P - Triple combination therapy of lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Zhi-Cheng Lai
Session: e-Poster Display Session
173P - Regorafenib in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in real-world practice in Asia: Interim results from the observational REFINE study
Presenter: Ho Yeong Lim
Session: e-Poster Display Session