Abstract 137P
Background
Circulating tumor DNA (CtDNA) has shown its negative prognostic value in a number of studies, however, data on the role of ctDNA in resectable gastric cancer (GC) are lacking. The aim of our study was to determine the prognostic value of ctDNA at various stages of the disease using our simple and cheap test.
Methods
This prospective study included patients with diagnosis of GC who received treatment from 2017 to 2019. Tumor somatic mutations were determined by target sequencing of DNA from FFPE tumor blocks. Sequencing was performed using the custom NGS panel covering regions of frequent somatic mutations in 50 genes. Tumor-specific mutations were monitored by ddPCR in plasma samples taken before and after surgery in case of resectable GC (n=42) and before and during chemotherapy in case of advanced GC (n=13). The median time between surgery and blood sampling was 7 days (5-15 days, σ 2.3). The plasma sample was considered "positive” if the content of ctDNA was more than 0.5 copies of mutant DNA in ml plasma.
Results
Tumor-derived mutations were found in plasma with sensitivity of 74.5% (n=55): in stage IV (n=13) – 92.3%, stage III (n=24) – 70.8%, stage II (n=11) – 81.8% and in stage I (n=7) – 100%. In the group with resectable GC 24 (57.1%) pts received adjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy. Detection of ctDNA before surgery did not affect DFS (HR 0.7, 95%CI 0.04-11.5, p=0.8). In 10 (23.8%) cases ctDNA was determined after surgery. Progression of the disease was detected in 6/10 (50%) pts with ctDNA(+) and 6/32 (18.8%) - in ctDNA(-) pts (p = 0.012). One-year DFS in ctDNA(+) and ctDNA(-) pts with resectable GC after surgery were 25.4% and 73.2%, respectively. ctDNA positivity after surgery was an independent negative prognostic factor according to Cox regression model fitted to T, N, and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 6.6, 95%CI 1.5-30, p =0.014).
Conclusions
A robust and economical assay of ctDNA detection is sensitive and demonstrates the prognostic significance of ctDNA persisting after surgery in pts with the early stage of the GC. Further clinical validation of this approach is required in trails with modifications of the perioperative treatment, in terms of escalation and de-escalation, according to the content of ctDNA.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
This research is conducted under the auspices of the experimental governmental assignment of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation and coordinated by the FSBI “Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
24P - The Pink Vans: Bringing cancer screening closer to home
Presenter: Frederic Ivan Ting
Session: e-Poster Display Session
25P - Identification of gene mutations in patients with breast cancer in a region located in the southeast of the European part of Russia
Presenter: Alexander Sultanbaev
Session: e-Poster Display Session
26P - Body mass index and clinical outcomes in Egyptian women with breast cancer: A multi-institutional study
Presenter: Amrou Mamdouh Abdeen Shaaban
Session: e-Poster Display Session
27P - Breast cancer primary site and laterality as predictive factors of prognosis: SEER based analysis for survival
Presenter: Eman Zin Eldin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
28P - Breast cancer care services at Nilai Medical Centre: A Malaysian experience
Presenter: Ratnavelu Kananathan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
29P - Factors affecting breast self-examination (BSE) behaviour among female high school students in Denpasar City, Bali
Presenter: Cindy Trisina
Session: e-Poster Display Session
30P - Male breast cancer: A rural based peripheral cancer center experience
Presenter: SACHIN KHANDELWAL
Session: e-Poster Display Session
31P - The prognostic value of pre-treatment peripheral neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) and its correlation with mutant p53 expression in Indonesian triple negative breast cancer patients
Presenter: Rosita Purwanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
32P - Clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in male breast cancer: A single centre experience
Presenter: Izzet Dogan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
33P - FDG-PET predictivity of pathological axillary nodal status in carcinoma breast-upfront and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) setting
Presenter: Krithikaa Sekar
Session: e-Poster Display Session