Abstract 261P
Background
While the expected survival of patients with FL almost reaches that of the normal population, the outcomes of patients who experience early progression within 24 months, that is, POD24 is dismal. Unlike the West, FL is less frequent in Asia as it accounts about 10% of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. To define outcomes and treatment patterns FL patients who experienced POD24 in Korea, we performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis.
Methods
The inclusion criteria were as follows, 1) Histologically confirmed diagnosis of FL grade 1, 2, and 3A; 2) Documented POD24. The primary endpoint was OS from the first diagnosis of FL.
Results
Between 2007 to 2019, a total of 73 cases were eligible for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 53 (range, 28 – 83). All patients were Asians. In terms of FLIPI-1 risk group, 14 (19.2%), 24 (32.9%), and 35 (47.9%) patients were categorized as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk group, respectively. Sixty-two patients (84.9%) had received rituximab as the induction treatment, and 11 patients (15.1%) had not. CVP was the most commonly used regimen (N=40), followed by CHOP (N = 26). Forty-four patients (60.3%) had received maintenance treatment with rituximab and 29 patients (39.7%) had not.
POD24 was documented after a median duration of 11.6 months. Rituximab wad administered in 19 patients, and platinum-based regimens (N = 23) were the most commonly used backbone treatment followed by bendamustine (N = 15) and fludarabine-based regimens (N = 12). PFS from the first progression was 23.7 months. The median OS was 128.9 mo, with the 5-year being 75.2%. OS did not significantly differ by the re-induction regimen, use of rituximab, or SCT.
When we compared these patients to our previous cohort in which 191 FL patients without POD24 were included, the 5-year survival rate was significantly inferior in the current cohort (75.2% vs. 95.7%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
The 5-year OS rate of our patients with POD24 seems better than Western data, although there are many confounding factors including baseline FLIPI and the induction treatment. As expected, the 5-year OS rate of patient with POD24 was inferior to that of patients without POD24. To best salvage these patients, further studies are warranted to develop effective treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
104P - Safety and efficacy of HLX04 versus reference bevacizumab in combination with XELOX or mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomised, double-blind phase III study
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
105P - Prospective, open-label, observational study of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC): The OPTIM1SE study
Presenter: Tsai-Sheng Yang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
106P - Efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine and mitomycin-C based concurrent radiotherapy in patients with anal canal cancer
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: e-Poster Display Session
107P - Safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from the Australian cohort of the phase IIIb, international, open-label, early-access PRECONNECT study
Presenter: Timothy Price
Session: e-Poster Display Session
108P - Comparative analysis of two-stage hepatectomy and enhanced one-stage hepatectomy in the setting of bilobar colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Hayk Torgomyan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
109P - Efficacy and safety of biweekly or triweekly XELOX regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer
Presenter: hangyu zhang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
110P - Analysis for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) effect for colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Wei Zou
Session: e-Poster Display Session
111P - A meta-analysis study on safety and effectiveness comparison between FOLFOX and XELOX regiments on advanced stage colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
112P - Pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Asia subgroup results of the phase III KEYNOTE-177 study
Presenter: Takayuki Yoshino
Session: e-Poster Display Session
122P - Nomogram to predict short-term effect of radiotherapy based on pre/post-treatment inflammatory biomarkers and their dynamic changes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Shuai Liang
Session: e-Poster Display Session