Abstract 144P
Background
Paclitaxel is commonly used as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The decision to proceed with second-line chemotherapy and select a chemotherapy regimen may be critical in vulnerable AGC patients after progression with first-line chemotherapy. However, there are no predictive biomarkers to identify patients with AGC who benefit from paclitaxel-based chemotherapy.
Methods
This study included 288 patients with AGC receiving second-line paclitaxel-based chemotherapy between 2017 and 2022 from K-MASTER project, a nationwide, government-funded precision medicine initiative. The data included clinicogenomic factors: clinical (age [young-onset vs. others], sex, histology [intestinal vs. diffuse type], prior trastuzumab use, duration of first-line chemotherapy, etc.) and genomic factors (pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants). The data were randomly divided into training and test sets (0.8:0.2). Three machine-learning methods, including random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and artificial neural network with genetic embedding (ANN) models, were used to develop the prediction model and were validated in the test sets.
Results
The median age was 64 years (range, 25-91) and 65.6% were male. A total of 288 patients were divided into training (n=230) and test sets (n=58). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between training and test sets. In the training set, the AUC for prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy was 0.51, 0.73, and 0.75 in RF, LR, and ANN models, respectively. In the test set, the Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS were separated according to the three models: 2.8 vs. 1.5 months (P=0.07) in RF, 2.3 vs. 6.5 months (P=0.07) in LR, and 2.1 vs. 7.6 months (P=0.02) in ANN models.
Conclusions
These machine-learning models integrated clinical and genomic factors and can guide the selection of patients with AGC with a greater likelihood of a benefit from second-line paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Further studies are necessary to validate and update these models in independent datasets in future.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
341P - NUP214 gene rearrangements in leukemia patients: Case series from a single institution
Presenter: Yu Jeong Choi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
344P - Venetoclax and azacitidine compared with azacitidine monotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Azzahra Noersamsjah
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
345P - Safety and efficacy of platinum substitution in induction chemotherapy for mantle cell lymphoma
Presenter: Omali Pitiyarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
346P - An assessment of marrow-infiltrating T cells in early relapsed hematologic cancer patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Presenter: Ik-Chan Song
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
347P - New targets for adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL): A map for ATLL immunotherapy
Presenter: Zahra Rezaei Borojerdi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
348P - In-depth molecular analysis in the diagnosis of lymphomas with lymphoplasmacytic differentiation may provide a more precise diagnosis and rational treatment allocation
Presenter: Ella Willenbacher
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
349P - Overall survival and progression-free survival comparison of lenalidomide + standard therapy versus standard therapy only in indolent lymphoma: A meta-analysis
Presenter: Kevin Winston
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
350P - Intratumoural CD66b+ to predict treatment response in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)
Presenter: Mita Adriani
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
351P - Clinical features and treatment outcomes of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia patients: A single center study
Presenter: Devi Amelia
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
352TiP - Randomized phase III study of daratumumab (D) versus bortezomib plus D as a maintenance therapy after D-MPB for elderly or non-elderly patients refusing transplant with untreated multiple myeloma (JCOG1911, B-DASH study)
Presenter: Tomotaka Suzuki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract