Abstract 144P
Background
Paclitaxel is commonly used as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The decision to proceed with second-line chemotherapy and select a chemotherapy regimen may be critical in vulnerable AGC patients after progression with first-line chemotherapy. However, there are no predictive biomarkers to identify patients with AGC who benefit from paclitaxel-based chemotherapy.
Methods
This study included 288 patients with AGC receiving second-line paclitaxel-based chemotherapy between 2017 and 2022 from K-MASTER project, a nationwide, government-funded precision medicine initiative. The data included clinicogenomic factors: clinical (age [young-onset vs. others], sex, histology [intestinal vs. diffuse type], prior trastuzumab use, duration of first-line chemotherapy, etc.) and genomic factors (pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants). The data were randomly divided into training and test sets (0.8:0.2). Three machine-learning methods, including random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and artificial neural network with genetic embedding (ANN) models, were used to develop the prediction model and were validated in the test sets.
Results
The median age was 64 years (range, 25-91) and 65.6% were male. A total of 288 patients were divided into training (n=230) and test sets (n=58). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between training and test sets. In the training set, the AUC for prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy was 0.51, 0.73, and 0.75 in RF, LR, and ANN models, respectively. In the test set, the Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS were separated according to the three models: 2.8 vs. 1.5 months (P=0.07) in RF, 2.3 vs. 6.5 months (P=0.07) in LR, and 2.1 vs. 7.6 months (P=0.02) in ANN models.
Conclusions
These machine-learning models integrated clinical and genomic factors and can guide the selection of patients with AGC with a greater likelihood of a benefit from second-line paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Further studies are necessary to validate and update these models in independent datasets in future.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
281P - 10-year treatment outcome of prostate cancer patients with 3D conformal radiation: Experience of a single cancer institution in Iran
Presenter: Reyhane Bayani
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
282P - Predictors of outcomes in patients with clinically lymph node-positive prostate cancer after definitive radiotherapy
Presenter: Jae-Sung Kim
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
283P - Radiotherapy utilization rate and treatment patern of protate cancer at Cipto Mangunkusumo Central General Hospital (RSCM): What we learn from pre-pandemic era
Presenter: Riyan Apriantoni
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
284TiP - CYCLONE 3: A phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of abemaciclib in combination with abiraterone plus prednisone in men with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Nobuaki Matsubara
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
292P - Comparative characteristics of early cervical cancer diagnosis methods for Tashkent women
Presenter: Gulnoza Goyibova
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
293P - Carboplatin in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation: An alternative to cisplatin
Presenter: Natalia Isabel Valdiviezo Lama
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
294P - Concurrent chemoradiation with cisplatin every 3 weeks in locally advanced cervical cancer: A single arm phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Long Nguyen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
295P - A prospective study of dose escalated simultaneous integrated boost in node-positive cervical cancer
Presenter: Ritusha Mishra
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
296P - Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of therapeutic vaccines for patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3) associated with human papillomavirus: A systematic review
Presenter: Caroline Amélia Gonçalves
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
297P - The utilization rate of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for cervical cancer in Indonesia: Optimal versus actual, how far the gap?
Presenter: Charity Kotambunan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract