Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display

611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)

Date

02 Dec 2023

Session

Poster Display

Presenters

Thi Thao Vi Luong

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_4): S1707-S1716. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1380

Authors

P. Mando1, M.S. Faisal2, K. Jatwani3, S. Seghers4, J. Young5, L.M.N. Teuwen4, H. Prenen4, T.T.V. Luong6, E. Segelov7

Author affiliations

  • 1 Clinical Oncology Department, CEMIC - Centro de Educacion Medica e Investigacones Clinicas Dr Norberto Quirno, C1431FWO - Buenos Aires/AR
  • 2 Hematology Oncology Department, University at Buffalo - Jacobs School Of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 14215 - Buffalo/US
  • 3 Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, 14263 - Buffalo/US
  • 4 Oncology, UZA - University Hospital Antwerp, 2650 - Edegem/BE
  • 5 Hematology/oncology Department, Blue Ridge Cancer Care, VA 24382 - Wytheville/US
  • 6 Medical Oncology, Austin Health, 8006 - Melbourne/AU
  • 7 Oncology Dept, University of Bern, 3012 - Bern/CH

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 611P

Background

The ESMO-MCBS provides a standardized assessment of the clinical benefit of a study treatment, considering factors such as overall survival and quality of life. We examined the profile of scores for trials of adjuvant therapy or potentially curative therapies presented at ASCO22 to assess the applicability of the MCBS.

Methods

Abstracts and prior or subsequent (until April 10, 2023) full publications of phase 3 trials on adjuvant therapy or curative treatment presented at ASCO22 were assessed using the MCBS v1.1 evaluation form 1. Scores were calculated based on overall survival, disease free survival or pathological complete response data and graded as A, B or C. Grades A and B indicate a substantial magnitude of clinical benefit. Two independent reviewers performed the grading; discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus with a third investigator.

Results

Thirty-five trials were evaluated, of which 11 could not be scored due to insufficient data or endpoint not gradable of the remaining 24 trials, 12 could not be graded due to statistically non-significant results. The remaining 12 trials were scored based on abstract alone (n= 6), or subsequent publication (n=6). A meaningful clinical benefit was seen in 11 of 12 trials (92%) with a score of A (n=9) or B (n=2), whereas 1 study had a score C.

Conclusions

Applying the current ESMO-MCBS to adjuvant and curative phase 3 trials presented at ASCO22 has significant limitations, due to the number of trials not able to be scored. This is a particular problem for studies with non-significant results. Adapting the score to allow grading of all trials may better assist clinicians and patients to assess the value of contemporary research.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

E. Segelov: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member: ESMO-MCBS Working Group. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.