Abstract 611P
Background
The ESMO-MCBS provides a standardized assessment of the clinical benefit of a study treatment, considering factors such as overall survival and quality of life. We examined the profile of scores for trials of adjuvant therapy or potentially curative therapies presented at ASCO22 to assess the applicability of the MCBS.
Methods
Abstracts and prior or subsequent (until April 10, 2023) full publications of phase 3 trials on adjuvant therapy or curative treatment presented at ASCO22 were assessed using the MCBS v1.1 evaluation form 1. Scores were calculated based on overall survival, disease free survival or pathological complete response data and graded as A, B or C. Grades A and B indicate a substantial magnitude of clinical benefit. Two independent reviewers performed the grading; discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus with a third investigator.
Results
Thirty-five trials were evaluated, of which 11 could not be scored due to insufficient data or endpoint not gradable of the remaining 24 trials, 12 could not be graded due to statistically non-significant results. The remaining 12 trials were scored based on abstract alone (n= 6), or subsequent publication (n=6). A meaningful clinical benefit was seen in 11 of 12 trials (92%) with a score of A (n=9) or B (n=2), whereas 1 study had a score C.
Conclusions
Applying the current ESMO-MCBS to adjuvant and curative phase 3 trials presented at ASCO22 has significant limitations, due to the number of trials not able to be scored. This is a particular problem for studies with non-significant results. Adapting the score to allow grading of all trials may better assist clinicians and patients to assess the value of contemporary research.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
E. Segelov: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member: ESMO-MCBS Working Group. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
217P - Conditional reprogramming of urine-derived bladder cancer cells: A model for precision medicine
Presenter: Yu Dong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
218P - Clinical effectiveness of tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) versus GC as adjuvant therapy in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC): A real-world study
Presenter: xingliang Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
219P - Clinical effectiveness of tislelizumab plus TKI as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A real-world study
Presenter: Pei Dong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
220P - Heterogeneity in tertiary lymphoid structures predicts distinct prognosis and immune microenvironment characterizations of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Wenhao Xu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
221P - Genetic polymorphism of genes encoding cytokines interleukin1 1-alpha and TNF-alpha in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Anil Kumar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
222P - The association between response to enfortumab vedotin and peripheral neuropathy: A multicenter retrospective study in Japan
Presenter: Nozomi Hayakawa
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
223P - Patient and healthcare practitioner preferences for treatments in advanced renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Niara Oliveira
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
224P - WUTSUP-01: Phase II trial of neoadjuvant toripalimab and chemotherapy in locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Yige Bao
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
225P - A novel multianalyte signature for stratifying Indian non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A single center observational study
Presenter: Hari P S
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
226P - Prognosis stratification of immunotherapy by a mutational signature in urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Xuebing Han
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract