Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display

179P - The impact of pre-operative nutritional/rehabilitative assessments and support on postoperative outcomes in very elderly gastric cancer patients

Date

02 Dec 2023

Session

Poster Display

Presenters

Yuki Ushimaru

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_4): S1520-S1555. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1379

Authors

Y. Ushimaru, R. Kawabata, T. Takeoka, A. Kitagawa, N. Ohara, H. Tomihara, S. Maeda, M. Imazato, S. Noura, A. Miyamoto

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 593-8304 - Sakai/JP

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 179P

Background

The elderly have numerous risk factors, such as comorbidities, undernutrition, and sarcopenia. Therefore, they require careful treatment indications and management in cancer treatment. Body composition and sarcopenia assessment have been performed in gastric cancer preoperative patients to improve perioperative outcomes since 2018, and we have provided nutritional/rehabilitative assessments and medical support to eligible patients with collaborative practice (CP).

Methods

Of 881 patients with gastrectomy between January 2011 and April 2023, aged 80 years or older were included in this study. We compared the short-term perioperative outcomes of patients with preoperative nutritional/rehabilitative assessments and support with CP (supportive (S) group) and without this assessment (non-supportive (NS) group).

Results

Sixty patients in the S group and 103 in the NS group. There were no differences in age, gender, performance status, Charlson comorbidity index, clinical Stage, or preoperative nutritional assessment, but the S group had a higher body mass index (median; S: 22.2 mg/m2 vs. NS: 21.5 mg/m2, p=0.02) and higher ASA-PS (ASA-PS ≥3, S: 48.4 vs. NS: 24.8%, p=0.002). The S group had fewer total gastrectomies (S: 15.0% vs. NS: 29.1%, p=0.037) and more robotic/laparoscopic approaches (S: 75.0% vs. NS: 30.1%, p<0.001). There was no difference in operative time but less blood loss in the S group (S: 50ml vs. NS: 230ml, p<0.001). Overall complications were lower in the S group (S: 20.0% vs. NS: 36.9%, p=0.021), but there was no difference in Clavien-Dindo ≥3 or higher complications (S: 6.7% vs. NS: 12.6%, p=0.21). In particular, the S group had fewer surgical site infections (S: 6.7% vs. NS: 17.5%, p=0.041) and pneumonia (S: 3.3% vs. NS: 15.5%, p=0.009). Postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the S group (S: 11 days vs. NS: 16 days, p<0.001).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that pre-operative nutritional/rehabilitative assessments and support in elderly gastric cancer patients led to fewer postoperative infectious complications and shorter hospital stays.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Sakai City Medical Center.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.